Teams

Orange Slice

Spring Adult 18 & Over WeekDAY · Ladies 3.0 18s

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Ladies 3.0 18s have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Lindsay Buchholz
published
3.42
Karla Mata
published
3.18
Kristina Lackey
published
3.05
Kelly Towne
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Debra Brown
published 3
Erika Stone
published 3
2.72
Pearl Fields
published
2.70
Dinah Cassidy
published 3
2.56
Tara Termeer
published
2.35
Sharon Roosa
published
Kathleen Paz
published
Leila Banse
published
Martha Linahan
published
Tera Castro
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lindsay Buchholz + Kristina Lackey5451% games+8.6% vs expected
Pearl Fields + Debra Brown2343% gamesnot enough data
Erika Stone + Leila Banse224 matchesnot enough data
Karla Mata + Debra Brown314 matchesnot enough data
Tara Termeer + Debra Brown134 matchesnot enough data
Pearl Fields + Kelly Towne303 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Towne + Kristina Lackey303 matchesnot enough data
Erika Stone + Debra Brown123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lindsay Buchholz
45W–14L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.66
Karla Mata
87W–74L career · no lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
3.42
Kristina Lackey
48W–43L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Kelly Towne
52W–41L career · 2 lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.05
3
Debra Brown
23W–24L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Erika Stone
9W–22L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Pearl Fields
21W–24L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.72
3
Dinah Cassidy
22W–17L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70
Tara Termeer
16W–25L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
2.56
Sharon Roosa
9W–15L career · no lines in 2022
87%13%<1%
2.35
Kathleen Paz
20W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Leila Banse
25W–23L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Martha Linahan
11W–14L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tera Castro
12W–16L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.