Teams

B1 Raintree Raghavan Raqueteers

2021 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weeknight Men · Richmond Weeknight Adult 18 & Over Men 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.62 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-06-01vs B6 Avalon Ghita 3.5Won 10
W#1 SinglesBhargavaram Kallam vs Todd Mungo5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2021-05-25Lost 01
L#1 SinglesBhargavaram Kallam vs David Brown3-6, 2-6
2021-05-11vs B9 MTC SanderLost 01
L#1 SinglesBhargavaram Kallam vs Christopher Kochensparger1-6, 3-6
2021-05-10vs B7 Willow Oaks StallsWon 10
W#1 SinglesBhargavaram Kallam vs James Dunton6-4, 6-4
2021-04-20vs B3 CCV BrannanWon 10
W#1 SinglesBhargavaram Kallam vs John Reifsnider Jr1-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Weeknight Adult 18 & Over Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Lee Brooks
published
3.78
Bhargavaram Kallam
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.77
Ram Raghavan
published
Gary Wills
published 4
3.47
Madhav Kidambi
published
3.26
Stephen Ross
published
3.26
Paul Haley
published
3.18
Don Ha
published 3.5
3.13
Slava Sery
published
2.76
James Andrews
published 3
Jerry Dooley
published
Tom Foster
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Don Ha + Stephen Ross134 matchesnot enough data
Don Ha + Paul Haley134 matchesnot enough data
Lee Brooks + Bhargavaram Kallam303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lee Brooks
29W–4L career · no lines in 2021
<1%41%59%
4.03
4
Bhargavaram Kallam
146W–88L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.78
Ram Raghavan
9W–10L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Gary Wills
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Madhav Kidambi
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
60%40%<1%
3.47
Stephen Ross
10W–19L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26
Paul Haley
30W–34L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Don Ha
15W–27L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.18
Slava Sery
12W–16L career · no lines in 2021
15%84%<1%
3.13
3
James Andrews
5W–9L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
2.76
Jerry Dooley
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Tom Foster
11W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.