Teams

4 CCV A. Avery

2022 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-04vs 3 Burkwood JennifersLost 01
L#2 DoublesKerry DeLacey / Kate Beckler vs Kim Weis / Susan Vonderlehr Nolan1-6, 5-7
2022-05-28Lost 01
L#1 SinglesKerry DeLacey vs Corbin Leitch2-6, 2-6
2022-05-25Won 20
W#2 DoublesMelissa Mauck / Maria Murphy vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKerry DeLacey / Betsy Richardson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-07vs 10 Southampton HuizengaSplit 11
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Morris / Betsy Richardson vs Margaret Denue / Teresa Given5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKerry DeLacey / Alison Avery vs Kristin Tetterton / Laurie Huizenga2-6, 0-6
2022-04-23vs 6 Kanawha Ogilvie-IsraelWon 20
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Morris / Karen Williamson vs Irina Schaffernoth / Angela Woods6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesKerry DeLacey vs Leanne Lane7-5, 6-4
2022-04-16vs 1 Avalon Mier/MihalkoLost 01
L#3 DoublesPeggy Croke / Kerry DeLacey vs Annmarie Lobred / Sharon Harless3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-04-09vs 2 JRHS StewartWon 10
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Morris / Hyde Loupassi vs Melissa Stewart / Lee Moore6-3, 7-5
2022-04-02vs 15 Raintree RowlandLost 02
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Morris / Maria Murphy vs Crystal May / Bindhya Rusu-Mehes2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesKate Beckler / Kerry DeLacey vs Lorraine McGehee / Sherri Phillips6-2, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Kerry DeLacey
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 4
3.73
Ashley Millen
published 4
3.73
Karen Williamson
published
3.71
Betsy Richardson
published 4
3.68
Laurel Wise
published
3.67
Hyde Loupassi
published 4
3.67
Hilary Long
published 4
3.65
Suzanne Morris
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.64
Alison Avery
published 4
3.58
Tara Bennett
published
3.42
Melissa Mauck
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Nancy Taylor
published
Thornton Lambert
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kerry DeLacey
143W–100L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Ashley Millen
6W–12L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Karen Williamson
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Betsy Richardson
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
Laurel Wise
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Hyde Loupassi
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Hilary Long
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
Suzanne Morris
27W–8L career · 4 lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.65
4
Alison Avery
16W–13L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
Tara Bennett
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.58
Melissa Mauck
69W–76L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.42
Nancy Taylor
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
91%9%<1%
3.32
Thornton Lambert
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.