Teams

UPTA55A/Ross/Riverside

2025 UPTA Adult 55 & Over - USTA · 55 Adult Men - 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-03-29vs UPTA55A/Friedman/KrocWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichael Tindall / Mark Craig vs Dennis Gillan / Rick McWhorter6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDonald Barton / John Warden vs John Bird / Brian Friedman6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesHarry Luthi / John Spotts vs Robert Florian / Stephen Henry6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 Adult Men - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
John Spotts
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
John Warden
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Raymond Frazier
published
3.62
Harry Luthi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Michael Tindall
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Philip Ross
published
3.57
Jay Kianos
published
3.57
3.57
Gary Bible
published
3.53
Donald Barton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Stanley Henson
published
John McCoy
published
Mark Craig
published
Rocky Chapman
published
Thomas Nelson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John McCoy + Gary Bible4349% gamesnot enough data
Mark Craig + Michael Tindall2344% gamesnot enough data
Philip Ross + Thomas Nelson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Spotts
27W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
John Warden
22W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Raymond Frazier
12W–11L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
Harry Luthi
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.62
Michael Tindall
17W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
Philip Ross
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
Jay Kianos
22W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.57
4
Andreas Penninger
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.57
Gary Bible
13W–8L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.57
Donald Barton
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.53
Stanley Henson
5W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.40
John McCoy
14W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mark Craig
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rocky Chapman
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Thomas Nelson
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.