Teams

Sportime Harbor Island

2025 Tri Level Men · 4.0,3.5,3.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.59 / SOUTHERN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-03-28vs Armonk Tennis ClubSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPeter Bergman / Greg Naso vs Filip Wouters / Andrew Katims3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJack Cowles / Daniel Cellucci vs Luis M Jimenez / Chris Corrado6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2025-03-23vs Armonk Tennis - JimenezWon 20
W#2 DoublesDaniel Cellucci / Greg Puley vs Chris Corrado / Todd Neustat6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesGarrett Li / STEFAN ANDREEV vs Zhiyong Yang / Phillip Raclyn3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-03-16vs LIFETIME TRISplit 11
L#2 DoublesAnthony Lacoudre / Tanguy Hubert vs James Elliot / Raphael Rabin-Havt3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesAdam Ashcraft / Stephane Publie vs Joel Kestenbaum / David Richardson7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2025-03-01vs WTC: Tri-4.0 Triple TakesLost 02
L#2 DoublesGreg Puley / Tanguy Hubert vs Udayan Mittal / Hector Rodriguez6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesStephane Publie / Garrett Li vs Felix Quirante / Luis Alandy3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 DoublesLuca Tait / Greg Naso vs Anish Desai / Steven Chiu1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJack Cowles / Michael Garris vs Joel Sciascia / Brad Dunn6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesLuca Tait / Peter Bergman vs Jesse Brundige / Arjun Ganesan2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGreg Naso / Alexander MacLeod vs BRAD YUAN / Andrew Greene5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAdam Ashcraft / James Brennan vs John Swansburg / RICHARD McSPEDON2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-02-02vs SMC TriLevel MensWon 20
W#2 DoublesChristopher Greene / Greg Naso vs Chris Beels / Doug Thea6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAdam Ashcraft / Jaime Leivers vs Nicholas Lyall / Michael Winter2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-01-26vs Chestnut Ridge Racquet ClubLost 03
L#1 DoublesLuca Tait / Peter Bergman vs Mario Valadez Trevino / David Becker0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDaniel Cellucci / Jon Lincoln vs BRAD YUAN / Christian Stover6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSTEFAN ANDREEV / Stephane Publie vs Brad Cohen / RICHARD McSPEDON1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0,3.5,3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.77
Carlos Campo
published 5
3.55
Michael Garris
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Greg Naso
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.44
Luca Tait
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.44
Alexander MacLeod
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Peter Bergman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Shuhei Okumura
published
3.29
Anthony Lacoudre
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Daniel Cellucci
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Greg Puley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Jack Cowles
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Adam Ashcraft
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Jon Lincoln
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Garrett Li
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Tanguy Hubert
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
STEFAN ANDREEV
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Jaime Leivers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.62
Stephane Publie
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Susan Vaughan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jack Cowles + Anthony Lacoudre5255% games+8.9% vs expected
Michael Garris + Shuhei Okumura5361% games+6.1% vs expected
Jack Cowles + Daniel Cellucci4452% games−0.9% vs expected
Tanguy Hubert + Anthony Lacoudre6850% games−2.6% vs expected
Jon Lincoln + Tanguy Hubert3448% games−3.4% vs expected
Jon Lincoln + Daniel Cellucci2449% games−4.4% vs expected
Michael Garris + Anthony Lacoudre404 matchesnot enough data
Jack Cowles + Jon Lincoln123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Carlos Campo
34W–30L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
4.77
Michael Garris
37W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.55
4
Greg Naso
58W–32L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.51
Luca Tait
9W–24L career · 7 lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
3.44
3.5
Alexander MacLeod
19W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%67%32%
3.44
Peter Bergman
3W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Shuhei Okumura
20W–24L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Anthony Lacoudre
40W–51L career · 1 line in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Daniel Cellucci
32W–35L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Greg Puley
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Jack Cowles
48W–62L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Adam Ashcraft
20W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.12
Jon Lincoln
69W–72L career · 1 line in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Garrett Li
2W–11L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
3.09
Tanguy Hubert
57W–71L career · 2 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.03
STEFAN ANDREEV
10W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
2.89
3
Jaime Leivers
5W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Stephane Publie
22W–40L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.62
Susan Vaughan
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.