Teams

NOGTA/Gary Quast

2025 Southern Combo 40 & Over Area League · Men 7.5 (Area League)

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-08-18vs Sequoyah/Raymond ChangLost 02
L#1 DoublesGireeshkumar Gopinathakaimal / Jim Richards vs Shaun Lackey / Barry Owen3-8
L#2 DoublesAlan Buttenhoff / Dean Puryear vs Brian Thomas / Scott Higgins4-8
2025-08-17vs Sequoyah/Raymond ChangLost 02
L#1 DoublesPhil Johnson / Mark Williams vs Scott Higgins / Robert Hansen4-8
L#2 DoublesDwayne Bordelon / Johnny Kendrick vs Blaine Greeson / Edward Jones5-8
2025-08-06vs Sequoyah/Raymond ChangLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlan Buttenhoff / Gene King vs Raymond Chang / Mark Berry5-8
L#2 DoublesMark Williams / Gary Quast vs Jacob Bush / Dwayne McGhee5-8
L#3 DoublesScott King / Dean Puryear vs Severo Avila / Shaun Lackey2-8
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 7.5 (Area League) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alan Buttenhoff
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.33
Gireeshkumar Gopinathakaimal
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Gary Quast
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Dwayne Bordelon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Johnny Kendrick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Scott King
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Phil Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Jeff McBrayer
published
2.65
Gene King
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Dean Puryear
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Jim Richards
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Phil Johnson + Gireeshkumar Gopinathakaimal3254% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alan Buttenhoff
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Gireeshkumar Gopinathakaimal
8W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.33
Gary Quast
3W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.30
Dwayne Bordelon
0W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.29
Johnny Kendrick
7W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.12
Scott King
42W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.06
Phil Johnson
3W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
Jeff McBrayer
15W–11L career · no lines in 2025
0%7%93%
2.71
Gene King
4W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
Dean Puryear
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jim Richards
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.