Teams

No Refund

2026 Capital Tri-Level 18 & Over · Hold

11 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Hold have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Jode Ritsema
published
3.96
Sarah Grant
published
3.96
Lawrence Brock
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Julia Kim
published
3.64
Mary Beth Broyles
published
3.42
Kristin Messick
published 3.5
3.34
Merab Puleo
published
3.12
Abigail Douek
published 3
Chad Parker
published 3
Emily Warren
published
Jerri Lemanski
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jode Ritsema
9W–1L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%8%
4.30
Sarah Grant
34W–14L career · no lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.96
4
Lawrence Brock
324W–121L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.96
Julia Kim
3W–4L career · no lines in 2026
95%5%<1%
3.77
Mary Beth Broyles
5W–5L career · no lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.64
3.5
Kristin Messick
124W–117L career · no lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
Merab Puleo
5W–3L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.34
3
Abigail Douek
80W–38L career · no lines in 2026
<1%19%81%
3.12
3
Chad Parker
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Emily Warren
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jerri Lemanski
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.