Teams

LRSI-Sica/Sheheen/Trump

2026 Lake Combo Doubles 40 & Over · 6.5 Women 40s

15 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 14 9:30 AM
Trump National Golf Club
Sep 21 9:30 AM
Trump National Golf Club
Sep 28 9:30 AM
vs N/A
Renee Sica
Oct 5 9:30 AM
Trump National Golf Club
Oct 12 9:30 AM
Jetton Park
Oct 19 9:30 AM
Trump National Golf Club
2026-08-31vs LFEM-Emerzian/WestportWon 21
W#1 DoublesErin Finn / Lisa Pagano vs Kathy Buaron / Susan Ghirsig6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLlnon North / Wendy Lawson vs Linda Dlugosz / Carolyn Auten5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnn Baker / Julie Modrak vs Holly Reiter / DIANE FIORE4-6, 4-6
2026-08-24vs LCSC-Schmiedel/VR CSD SPARTAN PKWon 30
W#1 DoublesWendy Lawson / Jennifer Plaster vs Charlotte Rorech / Nancy Petit7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKimberly Sheheen / Audra Lenahan vs Joanne Empey Rodriguez / Kathleen Weisman6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKristin Brown / Kristine Gates vs Cathy Schmiedel / Sandra Dunn6-3, 7-6
2026-08-17vs LKCO-Cooper-James/PeninsulaWon 30
W#1 DoublesErin Finn / Catherine Gish vs Wendy Mizicko / Michele Phelan6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJennifer Plaster / Wendy Lawson vs Karen Cooper / Laura Shaughnessy4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKristin Brown / Ann Baker vs Denise Streppa / Gail Quinlan6-3, 7-6
2026-08-10vs LLAL-Allen-Telling/JettonWon 21
L#1 DoublesKristine Gates / Lisa Pagano vs Danielle Russo / Kelli Telling6-0, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesWendy Lawson / Llnon North vs Randi McClanahan / Cecilia Ringuette6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCatherine Gish / Erin Taaffe vs Heidi Stoddard / Rebecca Wilkins6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings20 teams · 6.5 Women 40s
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LMLA-Laliberte/CSD2051328
2LBBA-Barber-Pensler/Edgemoor2051329
3LRSI-Sica/Sheheen/Trump2051335
4LAWA-Wages/RR2051335
5LKGi-Gibson/Westport 6.5 40+1030017
6LKGR-Grathwohl/RR Wildcats1030013
7LHHU-Hughes/JETTON1021432
8LDST-Stamey-Reimann/SCC1142451
9LSBE-Beardslee/Westport1142545
10LSTH-Theisen/Jetton1133760
11LWGO-Goodwin/NMP 6.5 Mon 40+1124852
12LJFR-Frye-Pangilinan/NS1124856
13LMRO-Romley-Bartolucci/Jetton000000
14LCJO-Johnson/Bailey 40+ 6.5 Tues pm0112430
15LGEA-Earnshaw/Skybrook0103637
16LKCA-Carvelli-Resener/Jetton0103636
17LLAL-Allen-Telling/Jetton02241065
18LCSC-Schmiedel/VR CSD SPARTAN PK02151171
19LKCO-Cooper-James/Peninsula02151172
20LFEM-Emerzian/Westport02061271

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Lisa Pagano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Catherine Gish
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Kimberly Sheheen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Kristin Brown
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Llnon North
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Jennifer Plaster
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.92
Audra Lenahan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.91
Rebecca Shady
published 3
2.89
Julie Modrak
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Erin Finn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Kristine Gates
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.72
Erin Taaffe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Wendy Lawson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.57
Ann Baker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Renee Sica
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Sheheen + Jennifer Plaster2343% games+3.7% vs expected
Erin Taaffe + Wendy Lawson2447% games−6.8% vs expected
Jennifer Plaster + Catherine Gish213 matchesnot enough data
Llnon North + Catherine Gish213 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca Shady + Audra Lenahan213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Pagano
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%55%44%
3.48
3.5
Catherine Gish
37W–37L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%91%1%
3.18
Kimberly Sheheen
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
10%90%1%
3.17
Kristin Brown
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.03
3.5
Llnon North
72W–69L career · 2 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.03
3.5
Jennifer Plaster
119W–119L career · 2 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.02
3
Audra Lenahan
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Rebecca Shady
42W–40L career · no lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.91
Julie Modrak
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
80%20%<1%
2.89
3
Erin Finn
8W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
2.86
Kristine Gates
5W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Erin Taaffe
69W–89L career · 1 line in 2026
5%94%2%
2.72
3
Wendy Lawson
67W–52L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%91%1%
2.68
3
Ann Baker
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
2.57
Renee Sica
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.