Teams

BC-PVTC/GalenaMiller-Horii

2022 ADULT 18 & OVER - Beach Cities · BC Women - 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.83 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-07-03vs BC-WestEnd/ForrestBleakleySplit 11
L#1 DoublesRandi Young / Teena Wapner vs Jennie Speciale / Tami Reyes1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesYuko Tong / Rika Tanous vs Dana Heyman / Charmaine Nielsen6-4, 6-4
2022-06-19Lost 01
L#2 SinglesRika Tanous vs Jaime Lee6-7, 1-6
2022-06-12Won 10
W#2 SinglesRika Tanous vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-11vs BC-LLW-AltaVista/MaryRoseKalemLost 02
L#1 DoublesRandi Young / Deirdre Hunt vs Erin Fiorito / Rita Benson5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRika Tanous / Lisa Hawk vs Juli Vadney / Nachi Smith0-6, 4-6
2022-05-29vs BC-Kramer/SophiesSokolowLost 02
L#1 DoublesCarol Flick / Randi Young vs Kara Salmonson / Jillian Morneau5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJacqueline Geiger / Rika Tanous vs Gail Starinieri / Wendy Waldman6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2022-05-14vs BC-MCC/JhoannaTorresLost 02
L#2 DoublesKathleen Parks / Randi Young vs Kristen Finn / Julie Watts3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Hawk / Rika Tanous vs Leasa Ireland / JoAnn Totzke3-6, 1-6
2022-04-16vs BC-AltaVista/RihoNakanoWon 10
W#1 DoublesVenita McLay / Randi Young vs Carol Ecker / Ingrid Flintoft6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2022-04-10Lost 01
L#1 SinglesRika Tanous vs Colby Frantz1-6, 1-6
2022-04-03vs BC-MCC/JhoannaTorresLost 01
L#3 DoublesShubha Chick / Rika Tanous vs Leasa Ireland / Julie Watts4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Women - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
3.76
Beth Rager
published 4
3.65
Shubha Chick
published
3.53
Lisa Hawk
published
3.50
Venita McLay
published
3.49
Michelle Rosen
published
3.42
Teena Wapner
published
3.32
Rika Tanous
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Jacqueline Geiger
published
Miki Heinonen
published
Randi Young
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Galena Miller-Horii
5W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.84
4
Beth Rager
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
Shubha Chick
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
Lisa Hawk
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%42%58%
3.53
Venita McLay
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.50
Michelle Rosen
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
3.49
Teena Wapner
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Rika Tanous
128W–103L career · 8 lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
Jacqueline Geiger
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Miki Heinonen
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Randi Young
46W–65L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.