Teams

YTC-Ferguson

2026 Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 MEN

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-04-12vs EW-PC-KohanLost 02
L#1 DoublesRick Vaughan / David Whiteside vs Wayne Kohan / Peter Rysavy2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTerry Kempton / Ken Wagar vs Craig Hansen / Bart Munson5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2026-04-11vs EW-WRAC-RechtinLost 12
W#1 DoublesMark Cherry / Ken Wagar vs Michael Bendtsen / Tom Rechtin6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRick Vaughan / Terry Keenhan vs Richard Lester / Stephen Knox1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Whiteside / Dan Ferguson vs Greg Brizendine / Steve Ovenell3-6, 3-6
2026-04-10vs PFC-WillmanWon 30
W#1 DoublesRick Vaughan / Mark Cherry vs Ray Willman / John Omlin6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDavid Whiteside / Dan Ferguson vs Andre LaSalle / Jorge Pinos6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesTerry Kempton / Ken Wagar vs Steve Lamberson / Charles McElligott6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Rick Vaughan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Dan Ferguson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
David Whiteside
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Ken Wagar
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Mark Cherry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Terry Keenhan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Terry Kempton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Whiteside + Dan Ferguson3255% gamesnot enough data
Rick Vaughan + Mark Cherry314 matchesnot enough data
Terry Kempton + Ken Wagar213 matchesnot enough data
Mark Cherry + Terry Keenhan303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rick Vaughan
13W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Dan Ferguson
19W–36L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
David Whiteside
15W–34L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
Ken Wagar
4W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mark Cherry
11W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Terry Keenhan
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Terry Kempton
15W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.