Teams

The Left Overs

2021 Charlottesville Mixed 18 & Over · Charlottesville Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.79 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-08-16vs Scared HitlessLost 02
L#1 DoublesDerek Frazier / Amy Taggart vs Robert Emery / Stacy Moren2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTammy Hertel / Peter Welch vs Noel Jorgensen / Edward Lis4-6, 1-6
2021-08-13vs ACACWon 20
W#2 DoublesRene Roy / Susan Bayliss vs Lloyd Raupp / Pamela Jupin6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesDerek Frazier / Tammy Hertel vs Christopher Raupp / Dulcy Giuliano6-1, 6-2
2021-08-08vs Scared HitlessSplit 11
L#2 DoublesPeter Welch / Amy Taggart vs Noel Jorgensen / Edward Lis3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesDerek Frazier / Tammy Hertel vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-08-01vs ACACLost 01
L#3 DoublesDerek Frazier / Susan Bayliss vs Christopher Raupp / Dulcy Giuliano3-6, 2-6
2021-07-18vs ACACWon 20
W#1 DoublesDerek Frazier / Tammy Hertel vs Mary Jo Natali / Lloyd Raupp6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSusan Bayliss / Rene Roy vs Jane Elmore / Lester Yuen6-3, 6-3
2021-07-02vs Scared HitlessLost 01
L#3 DoublesRene Roy / Amy Taggart vs Stephanie Hall / Ben Jorgensen7-5, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Lauren Suggs
published
3.74
Derek Frazier
published 4
3.73
Tammy Hertel
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.58
Benjamin Baker
published 4
3.55
Rene Roy
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.22
Amy Taggart
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Dave Contini
published 3.5
3.00
Susan Bayliss
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Janie Shrader
published
Peter Welch
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rene Roy + Susan Bayliss3260% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Suggs
13W–7L career · no lines in 2021
<1%33%67%
4.06
4
Derek Frazier
13W–21L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Tammy Hertel
150W–111L career · 4 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Benjamin Baker
16W–17L career · no lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
3.58
4
Rene Roy
83W–88L career · 3 lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Amy Taggart
142W–98L career · 3 lines in 2021
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Dave Contini
7W–8L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Susan Bayliss
161W–227L career · 3 lines in 2021
51%49%<1%
3.00
Janie Shrader
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Peter Welch
5W–8L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.