Teams

TTC-Harrell

2026 ADULT 18 & Over · 3.0 Women (A18)

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHERN OREGON

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-10vs ACB-DeWolfWon 41
W#1 DoublesKarly Holland / Corinne Roberts vs Roberta Mason / Melinda Lilley7-6, 6-3
W#1 SinglesSara Mason vs Christina Snyder3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPolly Harrell / Dena Hulting vs Susan Berado / Lynne Oldham6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesJennifer Akeroyd vs Noreen Kaye4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnnaleise Earl / Yana Ingram vs Lindi Dewolf / Pam Gillet2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-05-09vs SOR-BGC-FreelandWon 32
W#1 DoublesKarly Holland / Annaleise Earl vs Darci Cronen / Carol Roeder6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJennifer Akeroyd vs Elizabeth Motl7-5, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBrandy Cervantes / Polly Harrell vs Diana Sandgren / Carol MacK6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesLisa Bennett vs Ashleigh Finley3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesCorinne Roberts / Katie Jager vs D'Anza Freeland / Tiffany Huey6-2, 6-3
2026-04-25vs STSC-GrassmanWon 41
W#1 DoublesBrandy Cervantes / Polly Harrell vs Shannan Murphy-Barlow / Janelle Leavell7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJennifer Akeroyd vs Kelly Greer6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDena Hulting / Karly Holland vs Michelle Miller / Meredyth Edelson6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesSara Mason vs Melissa Buis6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCorinne Roberts / Katie Jager vs Jill Habekost / Ashley Smith6-0, 6-1
2026-04-19vs ACB-Watson/MorrisLost 04
L#1 DoublesBrandy Cervantes / Dodie Wilson vs Amanda Ferrari / Charlotte Gilbride3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSara Mason vs Natalie Meyer5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPolly Harrell / Yana Ingram vs Jessica Watson / Jennifer Kelly7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesLisa Bennett vs Alexandra Morris0-6, 0-6
2026-04-18vs BGC-BennettWon 32
L#1 DoublesDodie Wilson / Brandy Cervantes vs Kris Meyer Dorr / Dannielle Ramos5-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesLisa Bennett vs Jessica Johnson6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesWei Wu / Polly Harrell vs Kristin Jordan / Laura Moir4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesSara Mason vs Liz Bennett6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDEBORAH PENCE / Yana Ingram vs Carly Irion / Michelle Miller1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-04-12vs ESTC-SpencerLost 23
W#1 DoublesKarly Holland / Brandy Cervantes vs Shelly Schmidt / Keri Pape6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesLisa Bennett vs Courtney Stefansen1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKatie Jager / Corinne Roberts vs Julene Littleton / Katie Kinports4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesAnnaleise Earl vs Shelly Iverson2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Akeroyd / Wei Wu vs Linda Spero / Natalie Miller6-4, 6-4
2026-03-22vs STSC-OstergaardWon 50
W#1 DoublesBrandy Cervantes / Dodie Wilson vs Jennifer Johns / Meghan Fletcher6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKarly Holland vs Mckinsey Jarnagin6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJennifer Akeroyd / Corinne Roberts vs Aidan Harris / anna bretl6-1, 7-5
W#2 SinglesAnnaleise Earl vs Erin Donovan7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPolly Harrell / Yana Ingram vs Ann McQueen / Rebecca Ostergaard6-2, 6-4
2026-03-08vs ESTC-SpellmanWon 21
L#1 DoublesDodie Wilson / Brandy Cervantes vs Amber White / Amy Aguero6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJennifer Akeroyd vs Laura Chen4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKarly Holland / Polly Harrell vs Katherine Crenwelge / Stephanie Lovdokken6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women (A18) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Lisa Bennett
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
3.01
Polly Harrell
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
2.95
Corinne Roberts
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.88
Brandy Cervantes
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.86
Jennifer Akeroyd
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.83
Karly Holland
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.83
Katie Jager
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.77
Dodie Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Dena Hulting
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Wei Wu
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.66
Annaleise Earl
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.63
DEBORAH PENCE
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.59
Yana Ingram
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.59
Sara Mason
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Polly Harrell + Brandy Cervantes4152% games+1.8% vs expected
Polly Harrell + Dena Hulting123 matchesnot enough data
Dodie Wilson + Dena Hulting123 matchesnot enough data
Dodie Wilson + Brandy Cervantes123 matchesnot enough data
DEBORAH PENCE + Wei Wu033 matchesnot enough data
Corinne Roberts + Katie Jager213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Lisa Bennett
6W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.02
Polly Harrell
16W–21L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Corinne Roberts
9W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Brandy Cervantes
9W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Jennifer Akeroyd
5W–3L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
<1%85%14%
2.86
Karly Holland
9W–1L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
2.83
Katie Jager
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Dodie Wilson
6W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Dena Hulting
11W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Wei Wu
8W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
2.66
3
Annaleise Earl
2W–2L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
2.66
3
DEBORAH PENCE
4W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
15%84%<1%
2.63
Yana Ingram
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
24%75%<1%
2.59
Sara Mason
3W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
2.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.