Teams

MILL VALLEY 18AW3.5A

2023 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.5

19 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Tina Jennings
published
3.46
Gail Dunnett
published 3.5
3.38
Lacee Phillips
published
3.38
Lisa Kift
published
3.32
Aimee McCarthy
published 3.5
3.31
Kirsten Edwards
published
3.19
Mary McLain
published
3.15
Mallary Walker
published
3.10
Hilary Lipner
published 3.5
3.07
Wendy Nichols
published
3.07
Tes Norlin
published
3.00
Toni Brayer
published
2.90
Wendy Crowe
published
2.89
Tuyen Bonneau
published
2.85
Marion McKee
published
2.72
Donna Rogers
published 3
2.59
Ingrid Tolson
published 3
Sue Glader
published
Susan Ferrington
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mallary Walker + Kirsten Edwards213 matchesnot enough data
Mallary Walker + Aimee McCarthy213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tina Jennings
6W–10L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Gail Dunnett
3W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
3.46
Lacee Phillips
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.38
Lisa Kift
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
82%18%<1%
3.38
3.5
Aimee McCarthy
8W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
Kirsten Edwards
11W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
Mary McLain
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
Mallary Walker
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Hilary Lipner
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.10
Wendy Nichols
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.07
Tes Norlin
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.07
Toni Brayer
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
3.00
Wendy Crowe
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
77%23%<1%
2.90
Tuyen Bonneau
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
2.89
Marion McKee
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
88%12%<1%
2.85
3
Donna Rogers
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%2%
2.72
3
Ingrid Tolson
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
24%75%<1%
2.59
Sue Glader
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Ferrington
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.