Teams

MLDBA-Baker/NMP/40+

2022 40 & Over Mixed Doubles · Mixed 7.0 Mon pm 40s

9 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-08-08vs MLPNOYES/River RunWon 20
W#1 DoublesCole Wilson / Cynthia Delay vs Rob van Epps / Natalie Van Epps6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDewey Baker / Brenda Martinez vs Ben Holden / Kelly Grathwohl6-4, 6-3
2022-08-07Won 10
W#2 DoublesCole Wilson / Leta Wiley vs Bruce Williams / Nancy Williams6-2, 6-1
2022-08-01vs MLJBanner/PeninsulaWon 10
W#2 DoublesCynthia Delay / Joseph Davis vs Elizabeth Foreman / Louis Foreman7-5, 0-6, 1-0
2022-07-11vs MLTVallejos/EdgemoorWon 20
W#1 DoublesDewey Baker / Brenda Martinez vs Richard Fogel / Amee Rush6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJoseph Davis / Leta Wiley vs Chris Rush / Linda Fogel7-5, 6-2
2022-06-27vs MLSBeardslee/WestportWon 10
W#1 DoublesDewey Baker / Cynthia Delay vs George Simonetti / Zahra Simonetti6-3, 6-2
2022-06-20vs M-LBEdenfield/Cooper/TrumpLost 01
L#2 DoublesDewey Baker / Leta Wiley vs Jeff Cooper / Renee Sica6-0, 3-6, 0-1
2022-06-13vs MLTStephen/CSDWon 10
W#1 DoublesJoseph Davis / Leta Wiley vs Walter Ortiz / Kathleen Rissberger3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-06-06vs MLDRoberge/NorthstoneSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCole Wilson / Cynthia Delay vs Marc Roberge / Leenee Roberge7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDewey Baker / Brooke Harris vs Anthony Ponzo / Kathryn Burdick5-7, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 7.0 Mon pm 40s have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Scott Wiley
published
3.83
Cynthia Delay
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.69
Leta Wiley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.57
Odette Baker
published
3.42
Dewey Baker
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.42
Brenda Martinez
published 4
3.30
Cole Wilson
published 3.5
3.10
Tom Craft
published
John Bezek
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Wiley + Leta Wiley3348% games−9.1% vs expected
Dewey Baker + Leta Wiley123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Scott Wiley
15W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Cynthia Delay
129W–102L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Leta Wiley
181W–87L career · 4 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Odette Baker
7W–13L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Dewey Baker
244W–140L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
3.42
4
Brenda Martinez
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
74%26%<1%
3.42
3.5
Cole Wilson
11W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.30
Tom Craft
15W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%22%78%
3.10
John Bezek
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.