Teams

NAZ/Hopmeyer/18&over/3.0W

2026 Adult 18 & Over - NAZ · NAZ 3.0 Women

16 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTHERN ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-01vs LiraLost 13
L#1 DoublesMichelle Pappas / Lisa Tullis vs Traci Lira / Kelly Ruelas4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJennifer Recknor vs Kaylene Osoria6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesRoberta Bloss / Meredith Dean vs Valerie Hauser / Taylor Coyl6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJessica Garard / CORI CUSKER vs Susan Spear / Jovian Morrissey6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2026-03-01vs LiraWon 31
L#1 DoublesLori Pappas / Becky Thomas vs Traci Lira / Kelly Ruelas6-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJessica Garard vs Valerie Hauser6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKim Conley / Meredith Dean vs Beth Miller / Kaylene Osoria6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBarbara Bates / Mary Fule vs Jovian Morrissey / Susan Spear6-2, 7-5
2026-02-28vs LiraWon 31
W#1 DoublesJessica Garard / Kim Conley vs Valerie Hauser / Taylor Coyl7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesBrenda Bourn vs Kaylene Osoria6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBecky Thomas / Lisa Tullis vs Jovian Morrissey / Laura Westray6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesCORI CUSKER / Roberta Bloss vs Atta Jorde / Beth Miller6-7, 2-6
2026-02-28vs LiraLost 12
L#1 DoublesJennifer Recknor / Brenda Bourn vs Traci Lira / Kelly Ruelas1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMary Fule / Barbara Bates vs Laura Westray / Susan Spear1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKim Conley / Meredith Dean vs Valerie Hauser / Atta Jorde6-4, 6-3
2026-02-14vs LiraLost 13
L#1 DoublesLori Pappas / Brenda Bourn vs Traci Lira / Kelly Ruelas5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJessica Garard vs Lucy Keyes3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Tullis / Johanna Steigerwald vs Taylor Coyl / Valerie Hauser6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRoberta Bloss / Joanne Hopmeyer vs Linda Robinson / Beth Miller6-3, 6-0
2026-02-14vs LiraWon 31
W#1 DoublesVicki Penna / Becky Thomas vs Lucy Keyes / Taylor Coyl6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesBrenda Bourn vs JB Birdt2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMichelle Pappas / Meredith Dean vs Valerie Hauser / Jovian Morrissey6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMary Fule / Kim Conley vs Beth Miller / Linda Robinson6-1, 7-6
2026-02-08vs LiraSplit 22
W#1 DoublesLori Pappas / Becky Thomas vs Taylor Coyl / Lucy Keyes7-5, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJennifer Recknor vs Kaylene Osoria6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesRoberta Bloss / Johanna Steigerwald vs JB Birdt / Ellen Radavich3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCORI CUSKER / Jessica Garard vs Beth Miller / Kelly Ruelas4-6, 4-6
2026-02-08vs LiraWon 31
W#1 DoublesVicki Penna / Lisa Tullis vs JB Birdt / Ellen Radavich1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKim Conley vs Taylor Coyl6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBarbara Bates / Mary Fule vs Traci Lira / Kelly Ruelas0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJoanne Hopmeyer / Meredith Dean vs Lucy Keyes / Kaylene Osoria6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · NAZ 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NAZ/Hopmeyer/18&over/3.0W08181430262
2Lira08141839314

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Becky Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.03
Kim Conley
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.88
Lisa Tullis
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.84
Jennifer Recknor
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.81
Joanne Hopmeyer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Meredith Dean
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.76
Vicki Penna
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Johanna Steigerwald
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.72
Brenda Bourn
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.71
Lori Pappas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Michelle Pappas
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.59
Jessica Garard
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.54
Roberta Bloss
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.51
Barbara Bates
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.50
Mary Fule
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.30
CORI CUSKER
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Pappas + Becky Thomas11359% games+1.3% vs expected
Joanne Hopmeyer + Johanna Steigerwald3544% games+0.8% vs expected
Lori Pappas + Michelle Pappas4349% games−1.6% vs expected
Joanne Hopmeyer + Roberta Bloss2443% games−2.2% vs expected
Roberta Bloss + Johanna Steigerwald51041% games−4.8% vs expected
Vicki Penna + Lisa Tullis6548% games−5.7% vs expected
Vicki Penna + Lori Pappas3942% games−6.4% vs expected
Lisa Tullis + Michelle Pappas6552% games−8.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Becky Thomas
34W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.07
Kim Conley
9W–1L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.03
Lisa Tullis
47W–31L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.88
Jennifer Recknor
17W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
2.84
Joanne Hopmeyer
27W–57L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%92%8%
2.81
Meredith Dean
8W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
Vicki Penna
40W–50L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
Johanna Steigerwald
29W–46L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Brenda Bourn
62W–48L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.72
Lori Pappas
31W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
2.71
Michelle Pappas
29W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
2.69
Jessica Garard
6W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
2.59
Roberta Bloss
11W–27L career · 4 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
2.54
3
Barbara Bates
18W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
2.51
Mary Fule
10W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
2.50
2.5
CORI CUSKER
4W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.30

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.