Teams

MTC Budlong 9.0

2025 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 9.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.25 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-29vs Westwood Henry 9.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesRichard Cordrey / Nancy Pitts vs Joseph Brown / Lauren Jones1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesHanna Mogilnicka / Andrew Kristensen vs Ryan Baker / Anna Shea2-6, 2-6
2025-02-23vs MAC Snow 9.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesAllyson McKay / Douglas Scammell vs John Bennett / Katie Hambrick6-4, 6-4
2025-02-16vs CCV Alley 9.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJoy Lareau / Justin Cerny vs Ashley Millen / Campbell Erwin2-6, 1-6
2025-02-01vs Burkwood Decker 9.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesDouglas Scammell / Karen Budlong vs Erin Decker / Kyle Russell6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2025-01-26Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJustin Cerny / Joy Lareau vs Edward Butterworth / Susan Powell4-6, 4-6
2025-01-12vs ACAC Coachroach PK 9.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTodd Kieling / Joy Lareau vs Naveen Chennupati / Erin Waters3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.08 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.71
Justin Cerny
published
4.48
Richard Cordrey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.41
Allyson McKay
published 4.5
4.24
Andrew Kristensen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.89
Douglas Scammell
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.83
Nancy Pitts
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Joy Lareau
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.32
Laurie Miller
published
Fahim Rahman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Hanna Mogilnicka
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Karen Budlong
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Justin Cerny
9W–3L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.71
Richard Cordrey
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
no projection at this level
4.48
4.5
Allyson McKay
9W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
4.41
4.5
Andrew Kristensen
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
4%92%3%
4.24
4
Douglas Scammell
100W–57L career · type A · 7 lines in 2025
<1%77%22%
3.89
Nancy Pitts
15W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Joy Lareau
84W–99L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
Laurie Miller
2W–9L career · no lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
3.32
Fahim Rahman
6W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Hanna Mogilnicka
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Karen Budlong
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.