Teams

Leon - Nichols

2022 Leon Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-04-12vs DukeLost 12
L#1 DoublesGina Herring / Karen de Cardenas vs Nancy Donahue / Kathy Maus2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJennifer Larson vs Cathy Warren5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTracey Cohen / Denise Whitlock vs Sarah Duke / Junko Stout6-7, 4-6
2022-03-30vs SimpsonWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Emmanuel / Tracy Propp vs Deavin Gibbs / Farra Noel7-5, 6-3
W#1 SinglesKristina Reams vs Jane Sukuro6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKaren de Cardenas / Elaine Rudd vs Leslee Simpson / Jenny Carter6-1, 6-3
2022-03-29vs BushWon 40
W#1 DoublesGina Herring / Tracy Propp vs Susan Byler / Suzanne Pridgeon2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTracey Cohen vs Irene Gleason6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDiane Kobes Houston / Karen de Cardenas vs Jennifer Winegardner / Becky Bush6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Emmanuel / Susan Ragsdale vs Cindi Giralt / Robyn Wainner6-2, 6-3
2022-03-01vs DukeWon 30
W#1 SinglesJennifer Larson vs Cathy Warren2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKaren de Cardenas / Elaine Rudd vs Nami Imaizumi / Kathy Maus6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Emmanuel / Kristina Reams vs Denean Sykes / Adriene Wright6-1, 6-4
2022-02-22vs BushWon 40
W#1 DoublesGina Herring / Tracy Propp vs Becky Bush / Juliana Schneider6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJennifer Larson vs Jennifer Winegardner6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKaren de Cardenas / Elaine Rudd vs Irene Gleason / Suzanne Pridgeon6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesDenise Whitlock / Farida Akhavan vs Cindi Giralt / Katie Brennan6-3, 6-2
2022-02-21vs BushWon 31
W#1 DoublesGina Herring / Tracy Propp vs Becky Bush / Kelley Corbari6-2, 7-5
L#1 SinglesKristina Reams vs Jennifer Winegardner1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesSusan Emmanuel / Kim Nichols vs Cindi Giralt / Robyn Wainner6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSusan Ragsdale / Elaine Rudd vs Tanya Weaver / Suzanne Pridgeon7-5, 6-3
2022-02-15vs SimpsonWon 31
L#1 DoublesTracy Propp / Susan Ragsdale vs Farra Noel / Eva Fernandez2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesKristina Reams vs Jeanne Dimitri6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSusan Emmanuel / Diane Kobes Houston vs Askal Ali / Leslee Simpson6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKaren de Cardenas / Elaine Rudd vs Sally Davis / Catherine Cooper6-2, 6-3
2022-02-01vs DukeWon 21
L#1 DoublesSusan Emmanuel / Jennifer Larson vs Nancy Donahue / Elizabeth Murray5-7, 5-7
W#1 SinglesTracey Cohen vs Cathy Warren6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKim Nichols / Susan Ragsdale vs Denean Sykes / Adriene Wright6-2, 6-0
2022-01-18vs SimpsonLost 03
L#1 DoublesKim Nichols / Tracey Cohen vs Farra Noel / Jenny Carter0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJennifer Larson vs Jane Sukuro7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKristina Reams / Denise Whitlock vs Jeanne Dimitri / Deavin Gibbs3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Jennifer Larson
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.39
Tracey Cohen
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.32
Elaine Rudd
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Kristina Reams
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.30
Karen de Cardenas
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.19
Gina Herring
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.09
Susan Emmanuel
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.07
Denise Whitlock
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.87
Susan Ragsdale
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Kim Nichols
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Emmanuel + Tracey Cohen3355% games+13.8% vs expected
Elaine Rudd + Gina Herring7850% games+3.9% vs expected
Susan Emmanuel + Susan Ragsdale141552% games+1.1% vs expected
Susan Emmanuel + Gina Herring101349% games−1.1% vs expected
Karen de Cardenas + Gina Herring5746% games−1.2% vs expected
Susan Ragsdale + Jennifer Larson8848% games−3.7% vs expected
Tracey Cohen + Gina Herring1448% games−5.1% vs expected
Elaine Rudd + Karen de Cardenas5452% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Larson
81W–99L career · 10 lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Tracey Cohen
64W–64L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Elaine Rudd
185W–162L career · 9 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
Kristina Reams
69W–62L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Karen de Cardenas
83W–66L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Gina Herring
212W–283L career · 7 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.19
3.5
Susan Emmanuel
73W–86L career · 6 lines in 2022
24%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Denise Whitlock
36W–63L career · 3 lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.07
3.5
Susan Ragsdale
59W–83L career · 4 lines in 2022
84%16%<1%
2.87
Kim Nichols
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.