Teams

Mixed Team 7.0

Mixed 40 & Over · Mixed 7.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-07-26vs Pandya 7.0 MixedLost 12
L#1 DoublesOctavio Carrillo / Sonia Diaz vs Javier Ibanez / Nilda Garcia4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesVictor Eljure / Alicia Medina vs MARIO JIMENEZ / Cynthia Romero4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJesus Gonzalez / Vilma Gonzalez vs Gerardo Gonzalez / Issa Harsanyi4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-07-26vs Pandya 7.0 MixedLost 03
L#1 DoublesJesus Gonzalez / Vilma Gonzalez vs Gerardo Gonzalez / Issa Harsanyi3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesOctavio Carrillo / Sonia Diaz vs Luis Jaimes / Nilda Garcia3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesVictor Eljure / Mamta Pandya vs Francisco Mendoza / Irene de la Fuente5-7, 4-6
2026-07-25vs Pandya 7.0 MixedLost 03
L#1 DoublesJesus Gonzalez / Vilma Gonzalez vs Javier Ibanez / MILERSY RODRIGUEZ5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesVictor Eljure / Alicia Medina vs MARIO JIMENEZ / Cynthia Romero0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesOctavio Carrillo / Sonia Diaz vs Francisco Mendoza / Nilda Garcia5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2026-07-25vs Pandya 7.0 MixedLost 12
L#1 DoublesJesus Gonzalez / Vilma Gonzalez vs Luis Jaimes / Irene de la Fuente6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesOctavio Carrillo / Sonia Diaz vs Gerardo Gonzalez / Issa Harsanyi7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAlicia Medina / Victor Eljure vs Javier Ibanez / MILERSY RODRIGUEZ2-6, 4-6
2026-07-24vs Pandya 7.0 MixedWon 21
W#1 DoublesOctavio Carrillo / Sonia Diaz vs Javier Ibanez / MILERSY RODRIGUEZ4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJesus Gonzalez / Vilma Gonzalez vs Francisco Mendoza / Irene de la Fuente3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesVictor Eljure / Mamta Pandya vs Gerardo Gonzalez / Issa Harsanyi4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Sonia Diaz
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.40
Victor Eljure
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.33
Alicia Medina
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Homero Ramirez Jr
published 3.5
Mamta Pandya
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Octavio Carrillo
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Vilma Gonzalez
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sonia Diaz + Octavio Carrillo2348% gamesnot enough data
Victor Eljure + Alicia Medina033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sonia Diaz
2W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.79
Victor Eljure
1W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
78%22%<1%
3.40
3.5
Alicia Medina
18W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Homero Ramirez Jr
1W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.12
Mamta Pandya
13W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Octavio Carrillo
2W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Vilma Gonzalez
5W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.