Teams

B4 MAC Pettit

2021 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weeknight Men · Richmond Weeknight Adult 18 & Over Men 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.71 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-06-08vs B5 Hermitage Dodson Team HermWon 10
W#2 SinglesDylan Brod vs Jon Nystrom6-3, 6-4
2021-06-01Won 10
W#2 SinglesDylan Brod vs Joseph Parker6-2, 6-2
2021-05-25Won 10
W#2 SinglesDylan Brod vs Nathan Longest6-2, 6-4
2021-05-18vs B8 Magnolia Green FoxSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPatrick Bray / Erich Yost vs Luke Yarabe / Dremon Miller3-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesDylan Brod vs Joseph Lewis6-1, 6-1
2021-05-11Won 10
W#2 SinglesDylan Brod vs Radu Siminiceanu4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-04-27vs B2 Westwood Whackers PayneWon 10
W#2 SinglesDylan Brod vs Harry Turton6-3, 6-4
2021-04-20vs B9 MTC SanderLost 01
L#1 DoublesErich Yost / Bill James vs Christopher Kochensparger / Tracy Marks6-7, 7-6, 0-1
2021-04-13vs B7 Willow Oaks StallsWon 10
W#2 SinglesDylan Brod vs James Dunton6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Weeknight Adult 18 & Over Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Dylan Brod
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.77
Aric Mueller
published 4
Greg Deeb
published 4
3.63
Alex Abbott
published 4
3.57
Jeff Kane
published
3.40
Ken Hammond
published
3.40
Erich Yost
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Darrell Eakes
published 3.5
3.10
Jay Pettit
published
2.86
Bill James
published 3
2.81
Kim Boys
published
Tom Rider
published
Zach Pettit
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jay Pettit + Bill James303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dylan Brod
163W–98L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Aric Mueller
13W–18L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Greg Deeb
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Alex Abbott
8W–9L career · no lines in 2021
16%83%<1%
3.63
Jeff Kane
9W–11L career · no lines in 2021
30%70%<1%
3.57
Ken Hammond
14W–10L career · no lines in 2021
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Erich Yost
142W–68L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Darrell Eakes
11W–11L career · no lines in 2021
<1%80%20%
3.39
Jay Pettit
11W–1L career · no lines in 2021
<1%22%78%
3.10
3
Bill James
20W–17L career · no lines in 2021
<1%85%15%
2.86
Kim Boys
2W–11L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
2.81
Tom Rider
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Zach Pettit
3W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.