Teams

James Creek (Rajesh Krishnamurthy)*

USTA Atlanta Fall - Adult 40 & Over Men · 3.5 Men

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-08-16vs Central Park (Hugh Pham)*Lost 23
L#1 DoublesSrinivasa Sudikhandailraya / Satishkumar Arumalla vs Viet Manh Pham / Choat Soviravong0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesSree Manam vs Thai Le7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesRajesh Krishnamurthy / Gopinath Rajendran vs Chris Stovall / William Scaffidi7-5, 7-6
L#3 DoublesDhinakar Gopalakrishnan / Kiran Kumar MacHavarapu vs Luke Huynh / HUGH PHAM4-6, 6-7
L#4 DoublesSukrath Mahajan / Murugan Andavan vs Amit Malviya / Surendar Rajavel1-6, 6-7
2025-08-09vs USTA Atlanta/Ashwin GowdaLost 13
L#1 DoublesMurugan Andavan / Sukrath Mahajan vs Dilip Dash / Mahesh Kulkarni1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesSree Manam vs Manoj Naidu4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLilik Tan / Satishkumar Arumalla vs Saurabh Suneja / Ramesh Manickam6-2, 3-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKiran Kumar MacHavarapu / Murthy Madduri vs Kumar Pillai / Kishore Kandalai2-6, 3-6
2025-07-26vs Central Park (Hugh Pham)*Lost 14
L#1 DoublesSatishkumar Arumalla / Sree Manam vs Loc Nguyen / Choat Soviravong2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKiran Kumar MacHavarapu vs Henry Dong1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMurugan Andavan / Murthy Madduri vs Viet Manh Pham / Luke Huynh2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesRobert Nazarowski / Dhinakar Gopalakrishnan vs HUGH PHAM / William Scaffidi6-4, 6-3
L#4 DoublesSukrath Mahajan / Gopinath Rajendran vs Surendar Rajavel / Scott Long0-6, 6-7
2025-07-19vs USTA Atlanta/Ashwin GowdaLost 14
L#1 DoublesSukrath Mahajan / Kiran Kumar MacHavarapu vs Prasad Marathe / Suresh Palani3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesSanjeev Reddy vs Imran Pasha Mohammad Abdul2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMurthy Madduri / Srinivasa Sudikhandailraya vs Sang Hwi Lee / Ashwin Gowda1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesGopinath Rajendran / Suresh Ramachandran vs Rahul Koul / Sanchit Malhotra3-6, 4-6
W#4 DoublesLilik Tan / Satishkumar Arumalla vs Saurabh Suneja / Ramesh Manickam7-5, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Lilik Tan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Sree Manam
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Gopinath Rajendran
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.28
Rajesh Krishnamurthy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Suresh Ramachandran
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Sanjeev Reddy
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.12
Satishkumar Arumalla
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.09
Srinivasa Sudikhandailraya
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.98
Dhinakar Gopalakrishnan
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.94
Sukrath Mahajan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
2.93
Murthy Madduri
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.90
Kiran Kumar MacHavarapu
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.88
Murugan Andavan
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.87
Ramesh Veluvolu
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Robert Nazarowski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rajesh Krishnamurthy + Satishkumar Arumalla5355% games+14.7% vs expected
Lilik Tan + Sanjeev Reddy2350% games−1.8% vs expected
Dhinakar Gopalakrishnan + Ramesh Veluvolu6259% gamesnot enough data
Sukrath Mahajan + Dhinakar Gopalakrishnan5064% gamesnot enough data
Lilik Tan + Satishkumar Arumalla404 matchesnot enough data
Kiran Kumar MacHavarapu + Ramesh Veluvolu213 matchesnot enough data
Gopinath Rajendran + Rajesh Krishnamurthy213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lilik Tan
8W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.54
Sree Manam
18W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.33
Gopinath Rajendran
21W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
Rajesh Krishnamurthy
20W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Suresh Ramachandran
11W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
3%93%4%
3.25
Sanjeev Reddy
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Satishkumar Arumalla
19W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.12
Srinivasa Sudikhandailraya
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
25%74%<1%
3.09
3
Dhinakar Gopalakrishnan
26W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
2.98
Sukrath Mahajan
10W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
2.94
Murthy Madduri
13W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
Kiran Kumar MacHavarapu
5W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
75%25%<1%
2.90
Murugan Andavan
0W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
2.88
Ramesh Veluvolu
16W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.87
Robert Nazarowski
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.