Teams

RFC:TBD:Green

2021 ME Tri Level · Women 3.5

4 players · average NTRP / MAINE

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-11-17vs WOOD:WoodlandsRacqueteers:FendlerLost 01
L#1 DoublesEliza Chappell / Danielle Dignan vs Heidi Allen / Karen Fendler2-6, 2-6
2021-11-13vs RFC:TBD:PickeringLost 01
L#1 DoublesDanielle Dignan / Kristie Green vs Karen Eberhardt / Therese Drapeau3-6, 1-6
2021-11-13vs RFC:TBD:MagantiLost 01
L#1 DoublesDanielle Dignan / Kristie Green vs Claudia Marroquin / Krystal Talbot7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2021-11-03vs WOOD:WoodlandsRacqueteers:FendlerLost 01
L#1 DoublesDanielle Dignan / Kristie Green vs Heidi Allen / Regina Yoon1-6, 4-6
2021-10-31vs RFC:TBD:PickeringLost 01
L#1 DoublesEliza Chappell / Kristie Green vs Martha Elbaum / Stephanie Glanville0-6, 2-6
2021-10-30vs RFC:TBD:PickeringLost 01
L#1 DoublesKristie Green / Kimberly Kelly-Brewster vs Karen Eberhardt / Meg Pickering1-6, 6-7
2021-10-27vs WOOD:WoodlandsRacqueteers:FendlerLost 01
L#1 DoublesDanielle Dignan / Kristie Green vs Heidi Allen / Karen Fendler3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-10-09vs RFC:TBD:MagantiLost 01
L#1 DoublesKristie Green / Eliza Chappell vs Agathi Haxhi / Valentina Kapothanasis7-5, 0-6, 0-1
2021-09-18vs RFC:TBD:MagantiLost 01
L#1 DoublesKristie Green / Kimberly Kelly-Brewster vs Agathi Haxhi / Valentina Kapothanasis2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Kristie Green
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Kimberly Kelly-Brewster
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Danielle Dignan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Eliza Chappell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Danielle Dignan + Kristie Green0538% games−3.2% vs expected
Eliza Chappell + Kristie Green6944% games−3.5% vs expected
Kimberly Kelly-Brewster + Kristie Green134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristie Green
120W–87L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.85
Kimberly Kelly-Brewster
91W–101L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
Danielle Dignan
8W–14L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Eliza Chappell
29W–40L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.