Teams

WHead (Southampton)

2025 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-04-30vs LPinzon/SCochran (Life Time)Split 11
L#1 DoublesKim Rivera / Esther Craig vs Kristina Cancian / Susan McDonald2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTeri Iezzi / Holli High vs Alyson Vaughan / Gladys Shinmoto6-1, 6-1
2025-04-23vs KCronin/Ferguson (Piper Glen)Won 20
W#1 DoublesKim Rivera / Esther Craig vs Dawn Tenev / Stephanie Rock6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTeri Iezzi / Cheri Johnson vs Lauren Taylor Grames / Joanne Joliet6-4, 7-5
2025-04-16vs BBaker (Park Road)Won 20
W#1 DoublesEsther Craig / Holli High vs Holly Meloy / Allison Purmort6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesShelly Steffey / Teri Iezzi vs Brittany Baker / Spencer Stoakley6-3, 6-3
2025-04-09vs EAnderson (Queens)Won 10
W#1 DoublesKim Rivera / Esther Craig vs Shefali Chudgar / Katie White6-2, 6-1
2025-04-02vs TThailer/PMullins (OPRC)Won 10
W#3 DoublesCheri Johnson / Teri Iezzi vs Chris Kennedy / Alyce Lofgren2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 DoublesKim Rivera / Esther Craig vs Jackie Graber / Gretchen Hildner6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTeri Iezzi / Cheri Johnson vs Sandy Towell / Julie Carlsen6-2, 6-3
2025-03-19vs SJPragasam/ERoach (Jeff Adams)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesShelly Steffey / Teri Iezzi vs Amanda Cheek / Jennifer Little3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-03-12vs ABroemel (Queens)Won 10
W#2 DoublesKim Rivera / Esther Craig vs Stacy Melton / Kait Beck6-1, 6-1
2025-03-05vs RJoplin/MKelling (Queens)Split 11
L#1 DoublesKim Rivera / Esther Craig vs Mitchell Kelling / Brooke Leonnig1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesHolli High / Teri Iezzi vs Renay Joplin / Annie Shook-Maier6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Kim Rivera
published
3.50
Esther Craig
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.29
Melissa Chitu
published
3.23
Shelly Steffey
published
3.19
Holli High
published
3.17
Cheri Johnson
published 3.5
3.10
Teri Iezzi
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.93
Pauline Styers
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shelly Steffey + Pauline Styers1532% gamesnot enough data
Esther Craig + Holli High404 matchesnot enough data
Esther Craig + Teri Iezzi033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Rivera
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Esther Craig
113W–61L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.50
Melissa Chitu
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Shelly Steffey
44W–35L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Holli High
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Cheri Johnson
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
Teri Iezzi
110W–84L career · 7 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Pauline Styers
67W–88L career · no lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
2.93

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.