Teams

FHCS PASSMORE

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-05-08vs MEMPK SMITHSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJudy Custine / Sally Amerine vs Marti Gilardino / Kora Gwartney2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCarole Passmore / Julie Moser vs Kendall Lehberger / Jennifer Daugherty6-2, 6-0
2025-05-01vs CSRC KLUCKLost 12
L#1 DoublesJulie Moser / Judy Custine vs Rebecca Kluck / Marian Phelps6-7, 0-6
L#1 SinglesSally Amerine vs Cm Meyers6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarole Passmore / Jenny Bender vs Lisa Coyle / Kendra Crider6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.19 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.51
Judy Custine
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Barb Tuthill
published 2.5
2.21
Julie Moser
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.17
Beverly Osmus
published 2.5
2.02
Sally Amerine
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.01
Carole Passmore
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Jennifer Shawver
published
Jenny Bender
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Moser + Sally Amerine4548% games+1.5% vs expected
Carole Passmore + Julie Moser71443% games−3.3% vs expected
Carole Passmore + Sally Amerine2443% games−5.9% vs expected
Carole Passmore + Beverly Osmus134 matchesnot enough data
Julie Moser + Beverly Osmus134 matchesnot enough data
Carole Passmore + Jennifer Shawver033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Judy Custine
19W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
2.51
2.5
Barb Tuthill
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Julie Moser
28W–37L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.21
2.5
Beverly Osmus
11W–11L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.17
Sally Amerine
14W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.02
2.5
Carole Passmore
20W–40L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.01
Jennifer Shawver
1W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jenny Bender
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.