Teams

CSU GREEN

2024 USTA ADULT 65 & OVER - NOCO · MEN 8.0 - 65 & OVER - NOCO

7 players · average NTRP 3.62 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-02vs HMTC PURPLESplit 11
W#1 DoublesKurt Fristrup / James Rose vs Rick Mohr / Keith Montey7-6, 7-6
L#2 DoublesGlenn Gibson / Jared Habein vs Dwight Muhlbradt / Kim Bender3-6, 2-6
2024-07-26vs LTA BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesMark Lee / Jared Habein vs Jere Barto / Klaus Weickmann4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDennis Knopf / Jas Dhaliwal vs Richard Stitt / Richard Kostecki1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJames Rose / Ken Field vs Dan McGlothlin / Leonard Martinez3-6, 0-6
2024-07-19vs FCCC REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesJames Rose / Jared Habein vs Chuck Bridges / Doug Ruffin1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKurt Fristrup / Robert Rubin vs Charles Edmondson / Jim Kelly1-6, 1-6
2024-07-12vs HMTC PURPLELost 03
L#1 DoublesJames Rose / Robert Rubin vs Kent Mueller / Peter Corran4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJas Dhaliwal / Kurt Fristrup vs Dwight Muhlbradt / Kim Bender2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDennis Knopf / Mark Lee vs Rick Mohr / Keith Montey2-6, 3-6
2024-07-05vs LTA BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesKurt Fristrup / Wayne Snyder vs Klaus Weickmann / Leonard Martinez4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJared Habein / Mark Lee vs Mark Bakeman / Ed Kellogg2-6, 1-6
2024-06-28vs FCCC REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesJared Habein / James Rose vs Charles Edmondson / Robin Wick3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGlenn Gibson / Dennis Knopf vs Brian Dunbar / Michael Gugliotto2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKurt Fristrup / Ken Field vs Paul Gronewoller / Don Walker6-4, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 8.0 - 65 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Kurt Fristrup
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.43
Jared Habein
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.27
James Rose
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.09
Dennis Knopf
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
David Boon
published
Jas Dhaliwal
published
Wayne Snyder
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Rose + Jared Habein2739% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kurt Fristrup
6W–22L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.85
3.5
Jared Habein
48W–66L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.43
3.5
James Rose
29W–42L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Dennis Knopf
16W–67L career · 3 lines in 2024
25%74%<1%
3.09
David Boon
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jas Dhaliwal
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Wayne Snyder
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.