Teams

Marino - RS Clay

2024 Escambia Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-04-18Won 10
W#2 DoublesDawn Marino / Marina Agadzi vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-04-11vs McCarthy - RS ClayLost 01
L#2 DoublesMarina Agadzi / Tracey Mcclurd vs KIMBERLY ANDREWS / Amanda Brown7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2024-04-04vs McCarthy - RS ClayLost 01
L#1 DoublesDawn Marino / Tracey Mcclurd vs Tami McGhee / Alycia Esmonde4-6, 2-6
2024-03-28vs McCarthy - RS ClayLost 02
L#1 DoublesLauren Anderson / Marina Agadzi vs Whitney Sumrall / Tami McGhee4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTracey Mcclurd / Dawn Marino vs Shannon Schluter / Cherie Krohn2-6, 5-7
2024-03-21vs McCarthy - RS ClayLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarina Agadzi / Tracey Mcclurd vs KIMBERLY ANDREWS / Tami McGhee3-6, 3-6
2024-03-14vs McCarthy - RS ClayLost 01
L#2 DoublesMarina Agadzi / Tracey Mcclurd vs Alycia Esmonde / Amanda Brown4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-03-07vs McCarthy - RS ClayLost 01
L#2 DoublesDawn Marino / Marina Agadzi vs Tara McCarthy / Whitney Sumrall1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Elizabeth Elliott
published
3.61
Kelly Dempsey
published
3.59
Marina Agadzi
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.53
Tracey Mcclurd
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.52
Dawn Marino
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.37
Chelsea Simpson
published 3.5
3.33
Heather Doerr
published
Emily Hillman
published
Erin Rhone
published
Leigh Clark
published
Michelle Telhiard
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracey Mcclurd + Dawn Marino4844% games+5.8% vs expected
Tracey Mcclurd + Marina Agadzi2447% gamesnot enough data
Dawn Marino + Marina Agadzi1438% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Elliott
7W–10L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.65
Kelly Dempsey
4W–12L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.61
Marina Agadzi
42W–59L career · 6 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.59
Tracey Mcclurd
63W–107L career · 5 lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.53
4
Dawn Marino
69W–110L career · 4 lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Chelsea Simpson
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.37
Heather Doerr
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%12%
3.33
Emily Hillman
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Erin Rhone
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Leigh Clark
14W–21L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michelle Telhiard
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.