← Teams

CAC-Bray/Lane

2021 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Suzie Glenn
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.26
Gretchen Newcomb
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
—
Nichole Anglin
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Chikako Hokanson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Paula Conway
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.83
Nozomi Bray
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
Results11 ties
2021-08-22Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesErin Hill / Suzie Glenn vs Tarynn Berkman / Mary Green-Zwemke6-4, 6-4
2021-08-21Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesSuzie Glenn / Michele Snyder vs Clarice Brown / Tammy Cofield6-2, 6-3
2021-08-01Won 1–0
W#1 SinglesSuzie Glenn vs Trina Newcomb6-2, 6-3
2021-07-31Lost 0–1
L#1 SinglesSuzie Glenn vs Kasia Boslaugh1-6, 7-5, 1-0
2021-05-08Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesLana Lane / Suzie Glenn vs Natalya Ramras / Karen Pickering7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKaren Ford / Nozomi Bray vs Lynne Nieda / Molly Wilson6-4, 6-2
L#2 SinglesNichole Anglin vs Danielle Barrett7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChikako Hokanson / Gretchen Newcomb vs Rachel Olsen / Katrina Phillips6-3, 6-0
2021-04-25Split 1–1
W#1 SinglesSuzie Glenn vs Cassia Carpio7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPaula Conway / Gena Martinez vs Shamera Daugherty / Elizabeth Domagalski6-0, 6-1
2021-04-16Won 3–1
L#1 DoublesGretchen Newcomb / Kathleen Sullivan vs Shannon Roarke / Kayleen Mendenhall6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSuzie Glenn / Nozomi Bray vs Loo Yah Leong / Kate Leatherbarrow7-6, 3-2
W#2 SinglesNichole Anglin vs Hasol Yu6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesChikako Hokanson / Paula Conway vs Janet Cathcart / Kristin Bialobok6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2021-04-09Lost 0–4
L#1 DoublesKathleen Sullivan / Gretchen Newcomb vs Mary Marsh / Julie Kim7-5, 4-1
L#1 SinglesNichole Anglin vs Clarice Brown4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPaula Conway / Nozomi Bray vs Yoko Moore / Jeri Finn6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesChikako Hokanson / Gena Martinez vs Becky Holzman / Diane Malhotra6-4, 3-4
2021-04-02Won 4–0
W#1 DoublesLana Lane / Suzie Glenn vs Elizabeth Burns / Sarah Robertson6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKathleen Sullivan / Gretchen Newcomb vs Christian Buchholz / Barbra Jorgensen7-5, 6-2
W#2 SinglesNozomi Bray vs Stephanie von Allmen7-6
W#3 DoublesChikako Hokanson / Paula Conway vs Jacquelyn Miller / Patries Ferguson6-3, 7-5
2021-03-21Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesJennifer Kuhr / Nozomi Bray vs Megan Daniels / Brooke Daugherty6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKathleen Sullivan / Gretchen Newcomb vs Elizabeth Domagalski / Amy Bucher3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 SinglesSuzie Glenn vs Christina Wright1-6, 7-5, 1-0
2020-11-14Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesGretchen Newcomb / Donna Klindt vs Susan Judge / Kathy Schaub6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesNozomi Bray / Itsuko Day vs Tami Socolofsky / Jacqui Slominski6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Suzie Glenn
47W–28L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Gretchen Newcomb
49W–70L career
1%99%0%
3.26
3.5
Nichole Anglin
81W–65L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Chikako Hokanson
26W–28L career
3%96%1%
3.24
3.5
Paula Conway
48W–75L career
5%95%0%
3.17
3
Nozomi Bray
60W–110L career
0%99%1%
2.83

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.