Teams

Gill-Labadie/40/6.5/NOD/NOLTC

2026 NO Southern Combo 40 & Over - Women Day · 6.5 NO (40&O) Women Day

13 players · average NTRP 3.40 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-08-24vs Norris/Stone/40/6.5/CWD/GACCWon 30
W#1 DoublesAlexis Butler / Anne Hughs vs Leslie Clark / Lorraine Landry6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRenee Labadie / Lauren Wakeman vs Lila Rivas / Ana Aguilera6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKelley Gill / Megan Yellin vs Ellen Plaisance / Michelle Heidingsfelder6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 NO (40&O) Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Alexis Butler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Carli Simpson
published 3.5
3.26
Kelley Gill
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Cameron Link
published 3.5
3.25
Charlotte Viener
published 3.5
3.22
Renee Labadie
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Anne Hughs
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.01
Meghan Stander
published
2.95
Mari-Ann Roberson
published
2.87
Lauren Wakeman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Gretchen Pell
published
2.81
Marcie Gardner
published
2.78
Megan Yellin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meghan Stander + Anne Hughs5270% games+11.4% vs expected
Gretchen Pell + Marcie Gardner4644% games+8.8% vs expected
Kelley Gill + Renee Labadie4645% games−9.6% vs expected
Kelley Gill + Mari-Ann Roberson2346% gamesnot enough data
Charlotte Viener + Alexis Butler314 matchesnot enough data
Mari-Ann Roberson + Anne Hughs314 matchesnot enough data
Kelley Gill + Anne Hughs123 matchesnot enough data
Renee Labadie + Anne Hughs213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alexis Butler
30W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.55
3.5
Carli Simpson
20W–16L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.31
Kelley Gill
13W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%5%
3.26
3.5
Cameron Link
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Charlotte Viener
11W–7L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Renee Labadie
28W–32L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%2%
3.22
3
Anne Hughs
66W–40L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%10%90%
3.18
Meghan Stander
21W–21L career · no lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.01
Mari-Ann Roberson
30W–24L career · no lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.95
Lauren Wakeman
11W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
Gretchen Pell
20W–19L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Marcie Gardner
15W–22L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
Megan Yellin
19W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.