Teams

EM NAVY

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-09-02vs SKY YELLOWSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTIMOTHY DENEZZA / Ryan Matley vs Todd Young / Tim Godzich6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMark Leher / Matt Arnold vs Brian Hunter / Brian Willoughby3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-08-26vs SKY GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesTIMOTHY DENEZZA / Jason Krankota vs Aaron Duke / Jon Kalstein7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDavid Steimel / Andy Wurst vs Steven Mihan / David Marom4-6, 6-7
2024-08-12vs DTP ORANGESplit 11
L#1 DoublesTIMOTHY DENEZZA / Jason Krankota vs Michael Aschenbrener / Scott Jahnke4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRyan Matley / David Steimel vs Christopher Gilbert / Andrew Horning6-4, 6-4
2024-07-29vs CM BLACKLost 01
L#1 DoublesMark Leher / David Steimel vs David Krutsinger / John Dellasalle7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2024-07-22vs WP-O GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesTIMOTHY DENEZZA / Jason Krankota vs Daniel Sierra / Alec Desaulniers6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Paul Jost
published
3.00
Mark Leher
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.97
Andy Wurst
published 3
2.91
David Steimel
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.88
TIMOTHY DENEZZA
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
J Scott Landers
published
2.60
Stephen LoJacono
published
2.54
Ryan Matley
published
2.51
Matt Arnold
published
Jason Krankota
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

TIMOTHY DENEZZA + Jason Krankota4158% games−0.4% vs expected
TIMOTHY DENEZZA + Stephen LoJacono224 matchesnot enough data
TIMOTHY DENEZZA + J Scott Landers123 matchesnot enough data
Stephen LoJacono + J Scott Landers213 matchesnot enough data
David Steimel + Matt Arnold033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paul Jost
19W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%40%60%
3.04
3
Mark Leher
49W–33L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Andy Wurst
12W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
David Steimel
59W–72L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
TIMOTHY DENEZZA
40W–35L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
2.88
J Scott Landers
13W–14L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.70
Stephen LoJacono
10W–12L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
2.60
Ryan Matley
12W–19L career · no lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
2.54
Matt Arnold
3W–16L career · no lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
2.51
Jason Krankota
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.