Teams

Lakes @ CH/Holdorf-Gerard W3.5S

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Saturday League

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-06-14Won 10
W#3 DoublesLisa Holdorf / Lisken Kastalanych vs Julie Anderson / Susan Cannon6-3, 6-1
2025-05-31Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLisa Holdorf / Pam Boronski vs Amanda Forrest / Marianne Hark2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-05-10Won 10
W#3 DoublesLisa Holdorf / Patti Kaiser vs Melissa Monroe / Melissa Reynolds6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S W. Saturday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Kelsey Thornton
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.52
Holly Merritt
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.48
Carol Gerard
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.45
Jane Jackson
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.38
Betty Preston
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.37
Jana Ricker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.34
Dana Maksimovich
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Tara Hooper
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
3.29
Rhonda Price
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.29
Julia Cisneros
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
3.28
Pam Boronski
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.26
Patti Kaiser
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.22
Lisa Holdorf
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Danelle Krupa
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Christina Norrie
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.14
Lisken Kastalanych
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.14
Mendy Hatley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Jane Carter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tara Hooper + Julia Cisneros7160% games+7.0% vs expected
Pam Boronski + Lisa Holdorf6355% games+0.8% vs expected
Patti Kaiser + Mendy Hatley4350% games−11.7% vs expected
Mary Jane Carter + Danelle Krupa5071% gamesnot enough data
Carol Gerard + Rhonda Price4152% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Holdorf + Jane Jackson314 matchesnot enough data
Betty Preston + Lisa Holdorf123 matchesnot enough data
Patti Kaiser + Lisken Kastalanych213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelsey Thornton
18W–0L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.84
Holly Merritt
13W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.52
3.5
Carol Gerard
16W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
Jane Jackson
9W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
64%36%<1%
3.45
3.5
Betty Preston
12W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Jana Ricker
7W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
3.37
3.5
Dana Maksimovich
11W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.34
Tara Hooper
22W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
Rhonda Price
17W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Julia Cisneros
13W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Pam Boronski
19W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Patti Kaiser
17W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Lisa Holdorf
19W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Danelle Krupa
17W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Christina Norrie
16W–12L career · 8 lines in 2025
12%88%1%
3.17
Lisken Kastalanych
7W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
Mendy Hatley
10W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.14
Mary Jane Carter
9W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.