Teams

Lindsey

2024 Mixed 40&over-NE · 3.5 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.64 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-07-14vs greenWon 20
W#1 DoublesGlynn Stone / Suzanne Cervantes vs Alicia Green / MOZART DOR6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCasey James / Leanne Pounders vs Sheila Matthews / Karthik Venkatesh Prasad7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2024-06-18vs greenWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrad Clayton / Jamie Clayton vs Johnny Burk / Kala Parker6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCasey James / Suzanne Cervantes vs John Browning / Laura Hodges6-0, 7-5
2024-06-13vs greenWon 30
W#1 DoublesCasey James / Suzanne Cervantes vs Jesse Cromwell / Laura Hodges6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrent Waldrop / Arian Waldrop vs MOZART DOR / Danielle Burk6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBrad Clayton / Jamie Clayton vs Paul Perry / Kellie Mathis6-3, 6-0
2024-06-04vs greenWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrent Waldrop / Arian Waldrop vs Karthik Venkatesh Prasad / Sheila Matthews6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesGlynn Stone / Leanne Pounders vs John Browning / Danielle Burk4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesJamie Lindsey / Susanne Lindsey vs Johnny Burk / Kala Parker6-3, 6-4
2024-05-14vs greenWon 30
W#1 DoublesJamie Lindsey / Susanne Lindsey vs Jesse Cromwell / Sheila Matthews6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBrad Clayton / Jamie Clayton vs Paul Perry / Kellie Mathis7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesGlynn Stone / Leanne Pounders vs Praveen Panickar / Laura Hodges6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lindsey50141593
2green0511428172

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Brad Clayton
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.61
Jamie Lindsey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.55
Suzanne Cervantes
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.51
Susanne Lindsey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.43
Brent Waldrop
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.38
Casey James
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Glynn Stone
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Arian Waldrop
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Jamie Clayton
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Leanne Pounders
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susanne Lindsey + Jamie Lindsey8367% games+16.3% vs expected
Jamie Clayton + Brad Clayton7163% games+4.6% vs expected
Casey James + Suzanne Cervantes5166% games+2.3% vs expected
Arian Waldrop + Brent Waldrop4159% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brad Clayton
24W–6L career · 3 lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
3.63
4
Jamie Lindsey
21W–14L career · 4 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.61
Suzanne Cervantes
74W–23L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%36%64%
3.55
Susanne Lindsey
53W–20L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
3.51
3.5
Brent Waldrop
20W–9L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%71%28%
3.43
3.5
Casey James
12W–4L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.38
3.5
Glynn Stone
18W–6L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Arian Waldrop
48W–36L career · 6 lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.22
3.5
Jamie Clayton
18W–9L career · 3 lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.15
Leanne Pounders
20W–20L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.