Teams

Weston, Dawn

2026 HOA Adult Low Tri-Level 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 · Women Low Tri-Level 3.0, 3.5, 4.0

18 players · average NTRP 3.55 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-23vs Duba, ErinLost 12
L#1 DoublesAudra Dericotte / Connie Hucker vs Ellen Griffin / Amber Heineman2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBrooke Witt / Annie Brown vs Erin Duba / Kaitlin Holt5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesBeth Wood / Kim Schrag vs Lauren Sotos / Carrie Patterson7-5, 6-2
2026-08-16vs Wang, YunxiaSplit 11
W#2 DoublesConnie Hucker / Mary Anne Kucera vs Paula Flattery-Aaron / Maria Moore6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAnnie Brown / Beth Wood vs Megan Mikel / Kylie Acosta4-6, 5-7
2026-08-09vs Vaughn OlaLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristy Saxer / Audra Dericotte vs Ola Vaughn / Blerina Boci3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJeni Schooley / Mary Anne Kucera vs Betsy Norberg / Stephanie Stevenson5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCarin Lehnert / Beth Wood vs Anne Scott / Julie Pangborn1-6, 4-6
2026-08-02vs Andrew, MariaWon 30
W#1 DoublesBetsy Berst / Brooke Witt vs Robyn Beckley / Tiffany McBride6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMary Brauer / Jeni Schooley vs Leah Bailey / Amy Rose6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAnnie Brown / Kate Nelson vs Jenny Bengtson / Jo Lyn Becton6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2026-07-26vs Snyder, KarenSplit 11
W#2 DoublesConnie Hucker / Brooke Witt vs Aiman Dvorak / Geniya Khakhalova7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAnnie Brown / Beth Wood vs Ashley Noah / Jenny Seifert4-6, 5-6
2026-07-12vs Gerleman, SarahWon 21
W#1 DoublesDawn Weston / Betsy Berst vs Sarah Gerleman / Naomi Tucker1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrooke Witt / Annie Brown vs Cheryl Morton / Laura Noll6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBeth Wood / Kim Schrag vs Shauna Ward / Christina Paquette2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women Low Tri-Level 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Betsy Berst
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.47
Audra Dericotte
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
Mary Brauer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Christy Saxer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.39
Jennifer Hudson
published
3.33
Connie Hucker
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Christy Mayo
published 4
3.29
Julie Rome
published
3.28
Jeni Schooley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Brooke Witt
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Dawn Weston
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Mary Anne Kucera
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Annie Brown
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.93
Kim Schrag
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Beth Wood
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Sun Jang
published
2.81
Carin Lehnert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Kate Nelson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeni Schooley + Beth Wood4167% games+13.3% vs expected
Mary Anne Kucera + Dawn Weston2548% games+7.5% vs expected
Dawn Weston + Mary Brauer6849% games+5.7% vs expected
Christy Mayo + Jennifer Hudson8352% games+4.2% vs expected
Connie Hucker + Dawn Weston11556% games+4.0% vs expected
Julie Rome + Christy Mayo5354% games+1.7% vs expected
Dawn Weston + Jeni Schooley3357% games+0.2% vs expected
Sun Jang + Carin Lehnert4161% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Betsy Berst
35W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
4
Audra Dericotte
69W–65L career · 2 lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
3.47
Mary Brauer
35W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.46
4
Christy Saxer
76W–51L career · 1 line in 2026
64%36%<1%
3.45
Jennifer Hudson
33W–21L career · no lines in 2026
78%22%<1%
3.39
3.5
Connie Hucker
22W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.33
4
Christy Mayo
32W–27L career · no lines in 2026
89%11%<1%
3.33
Julie Rome
35W–28L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
Jeni Schooley
39W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.28
3.5
Brooke Witt
24W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Dawn Weston
59W–64L career · 1 line in 2026
13%86%1%
3.15
Mary Anne Kucera
39W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.08
3
Annie Brown
57W–43L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
Kim Schrag
46W–33L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Beth Wood
31W–36L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
Sun Jang
16W–11L career · no lines in 2026
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Carin Lehnert
18W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%9%
2.81
Kate Nelson
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.