Teams

MPRC-Brinck/Arendes

2020 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Women

2 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Debra Hall
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.97
Ann-Marie Lundberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Results4 ties
2019-10-26Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMarjorie Brinck / Debra Hall vs Susan Gallegos / Theresa Hagerty7-6, 6-2
2019-10-19Won 20
W#1 DoublesAnn-Marie Lundberg / Hitomi Tamura vs Karen Laumand / Karen Kraus6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSun Allen / Debra Hall vs Anna Browne / Elaine Sibley7-5, 6-3
2019-10-12Won 10
W#1 DoublesAnn-Marie Lundberg / Hitomi Tamura vs Jean Jensen / Megan Davis6-2, 6-2
2019-10-05Split 11
W#1 DoublesAnn-Marie Lundberg / Suzanne Haberland vs Teresa Darling / Pam Garofalo6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDebra Hall / Sharon Arendes vs Diane Mallory / Cecilia Nguyen6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Debra Hall
58W–38L career
1%98%1%
3.26
3.5
Ann-Marie Lundberg
63W–71L career
41%59%0%
2.97

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.