Teams

Is.Pataki55S4.0

2025 Capital Singles 55 & Over · 4.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.92 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-25vs Da.Knox55SWon 21
W#1 SinglesIstvan Pataki vs Scott Andersen6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesJay Reiff vs Pete Vammino6-1, 6-4
L#3 SinglesBrian Dorais vs Thomas Zietlow6-7, 4-6
2025-07-18vs Da.Knox55SWon 21
W#1 SinglesJay Reiff vs Thomas Zietlow6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesDaniel Breazeale vs Daniel Knox6-4, 6-1
L#3 SinglesJeffrey Monaghen vs Hai Le1-6, 5-7
2025-07-11Split 11
L#1 SinglesDaniel Breazeale vs David Rowe6-7, 3-6
W#2 SinglesIstvan Pataki vs John Parsons6-0, 7-5
2025-06-27vs Da.Knox55SWon 20
W#2 SinglesJeffrey Monaghen vs Scott Andersen7-5, 7-6
W#3 SinglesJay Reiff vs Thomas Zietlow6-2, 6-1
2025-06-20vs Da.Knox55SSplit 11
L#2 SinglesBrian Dorais vs Daniel Knox6-7, 6-0, 0-1
W#3 SinglesIstvan Pataki vs Thomas Zietlow5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-06-13vs Da.Knox55SWon 30
W#1 SinglesDaniel Breazeale vs Thomas Zietlow6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesJeffrey Monaghen vs John Parsons6-3, 6-3
W#3 SinglesIstvan Pataki vs Pete Vammino6-4, 6-2
2025-06-06vs Da.Knox55SSplit 11
L#1 SinglesDaniel Breazeale vs Hai Le4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJay Reiff vs Scott Andersen2-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Istvan Pataki
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.80
Daniel Breazeale
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.74
Jay Reiff
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 4
3.72
Alan Crews
published 4
3.65
Jeffrey Monaghen
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
3.54
Brian Dorais
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.44
Ken Glanville
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Istvan Pataki + Daniel Breazeale314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Istvan Pataki
111W–77L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Daniel Breazeale
216W–149L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Jay Reiff
45W–38L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Alan Crews
18W–14L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.72
4
Jeffrey Monaghen
181W–208L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Brian Dorais
137W–142L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.54
Ken Glanville
19W–23L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.