Teams

IE-MTC-Shelter

2026 USTA Adult 18 & Over - IE · IE Women 2.5

14 players · average NTRP 2.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-31vs IE-LLW-TCC-CroushoreLost 03
L#1 DoublesDebra Sherbert / Ericka Howard vs Darcy Weis / Paige Bennett2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesChristina Holloway vs Saehee Park1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDanna Cobbe / Maria Rosario Diaz vs Melissa Larose / Keysha Rodriguez1-6, 2-6
2026-05-17vs IE-LLW-TCC-CroushoreWon 21
L#1 DoublesAsher Lutz / Lauren Snodgrass vs Kathy Gensicke / Melissa Larose2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesTalya Franklin vs Melody Parker6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesDebra Sherbert / Lois Krejci vs Veronica Lopez / Darcy Weis4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-05-09vs IE-LLW-TCC-CroushoreLost 12
W#1 DoublesSamira Kashani / Isabelle Smihula vs Veronica Lopez / Darcy Weis6-4, 6-0
L#1 SinglesAsher Lutz vs Melissa Larose6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLauren Snodgrass / Lois Krejci vs Saehee Park / Shalini George3-6, 4-6
2026-05-02vs IE-LLW-TCC-CroushoreLost 12
W#1 DoublesIsabelle Smihula / Samira Kashani vs Kathy Gensicke / Darcy Weis6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMaria Rosario Diaz vs Saehee Park4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesChristina Holloway / Tristen Bellows vs Paige Bennett / Keysha Rodriguez2-6, 0-6
2026-04-25vs IE-LLW-TCC-CroushoreLost 12
W#1 DoublesPatricia Stephens / Talya Franklin vs Melissa Larose / Keysha Rodriguez6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesEricka Howard vs Melody Parker4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Eybsen / Danna Cobbe vs Darcy Weis / Paige Bennett2-6, 3-6
2026-04-18vs IE-LLW-TCC-CroushoreLost 12
W#1 DoublesLois Krejci / Tristen Bellows vs Kathy Gensicke / Paige Bennett6-3, 6-0
L#1 SinglesPatricia Stephens vs Melissa Larose4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesIsabelle Smihula / Lauren Snodgrass vs Keysha Rodriguez / Shalini George6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.31 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.52
Lois Krejci
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.50
Isabelle Smihula
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.49
Danna Cobbe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.48
Talya Franklin
usually #1 Doubles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.45
Samira Kashani
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published
2.41
Amy Eybsen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.37
Asher Lutz
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 2.5
2.31
Ericka Howard
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
2.26
Debra Sherbert
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.17
Patricia Stephens
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Singles 22% · published
2.16
Christina Holloway
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.97
Maria Rosario Diaz
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #1 Singles 14% · published
1.92
Lauren Snodgrass
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Tristen Bellows
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Isabelle Smihula + Samira Kashani2344% gamesnot enough data
Patricia Stephens + Samira Kashani134 matchesnot enough data
Patricia Stephens + Debra Sherbert033 matchesnot enough data
Danna Cobbe + Debra Sherbert213 matchesnot enough data
Talya Franklin + Isabelle Smihula033 matchesnot enough data
Samira Kashani + Debra Sherbert033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lois Krejci
3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%43%57%
2.52
Isabelle Smihula
5W–12L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%50%50%
2.50
2.5
Danna Cobbe
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%52%48%
2.49
Talya Franklin
3W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%55%45%
2.48
Samira Kashani
6W–12L career · 9 lines in 2026
0%64%36%
2.45
2.5
Amy Eybsen
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%74%26%
2.41
2.5
Asher Lutz
2W–7L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%82%18%
2.37
Ericka Howard
1W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.31
2.5
Debra Sherbert
5W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.26
Patricia Stephens
3W–15L career · 9 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17
2.5
Christina Holloway
0W–12L career · 9 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.16
Maria Rosario Diaz
0W–15L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.97
Lauren Snodgrass
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.92
Tristen Bellows
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.