Teams

Williamson, Greg

2026 Adult 18 & Over-JXN · Men 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.90 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-04-30vs Medina, ChristianSplit 22
W#1 DoublesLee Young / Travis Finseth vs Bain Foote / Jay Irving6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesTim Mask vs Ben Berry6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAkhilesh Ganti / Luke Armstrong vs Sourav Dutta / Rehan Ali1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesChandler Strain / Nick Morgan vs Christian Medina / John Patton6-1, 6-2
2026-04-30vs Medina, ChristianWon 21
L#1 DoublesLuke Armstrong / Tim Mask vs Ben Berry / Rehan Ali0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTravis Finseth / Nick Morgan vs John Patton / Brandon Norton6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPaige Purvis / Elkin Crews vs Christian Medina / Bain Foote6-4, 6-3
2026-04-14vs Sims, JonathanLost 04
L#1 DoublesLee Young / Greg Williamson vs Bryan Barksdale / Jackson Ikerd4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPaige Purvis / Elkin Crews vs Daniel Phyfer / Andrew Haile5-3
L#2 SinglesChandler Strain vs Bryce Ishee3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAkhilesh Ganti / Luke Armstrong vs Andrew Stubbs / Jeffrey Carmody1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-03-31vs Clark, MichaelLost 13
L#1 DoublesGreg Williamson / Nick Morgan vs Nico Jimeno / JD Hosemann3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesElkin Crews vs Manuel Valdez1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLee Young / Paige Purvis vs Tyler Mcintyre / Kelsey Smylie2-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesChandler Strain vs Michael Clark6-0, 6-1
2026-03-18vs Nguyen, TamWon 32
W#1 DoublesHector Custode / Nick Morgan vs Jason McKnatt / Bryton Hixson6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesElkin Crews vs Dominic Lopez6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesGreg Williamson / Akhilesh Ganti vs Josef Rutledge / Andrei Gregory7-5, 6-1
L#2 SinglesTim Mask vs Stephen Langley1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesLuke Armstrong / Lee Young vs Doug Burgess / Michael Foley4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-03-03vs Sims, JonathanLost 23
L#1 DoublesTim Mask / Travis Finseth vs Daniel Phyfer / Brennan Miller4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesLuke Armstrong vs Bryan Barksdale1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLee Young / Paige Purvis vs Bryan Howell / Chris Lee7-6, 6-3
W#2 SinglesJackson Dulaney vs Bryce Ishee6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesChandler Strain / Elkin Crews vs Jeffrey Carmody / Conner Fudge2-6, 4-6
2026-02-17vs Clark, MichaelSplit 22
W#1 DoublesGreg Williamson / Chandler Strain vs Zach Myrick / Matt Carpenter7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPaige Purvis / Lee Young vs Austin O'Brien / Dario Rosa6-2, 7-5
L#2 SinglesElkin Crews vs Michael Clark4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLuke Armstrong / Tim Mask vs JD Hosemann / Tyler Mcintyre3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Chandler Strain
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 4
3.81
Nick Morgan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.76
Jackson Dulaney
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.71
Paige Purvis
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.64
Lee Young
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.62
Travis Finseth
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.58
Elkin Crews
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.56
Greg Williamson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.36
Tim Mask
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.34
Luke Armstrong
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.29
Akhilesh Ganti
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paige Purvis + Lee Young4153% games−2.3% vs expected
Akhilesh Ganti + Greg Williamson1636% games−4.4% vs expected
Tim Mask + Luke Armstrong123 matchesnot enough data
Nick Morgan + Paige Purvis303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chandler Strain
48W–25L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%91%9%
3.82
Nick Morgan
66W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Jackson Dulaney
9W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
2%95%3%
3.76
Paige Purvis
49W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.71
Lee Young
18W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.64
Travis Finseth
24W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Elkin Crews
7W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.58
4
Greg Williamson
13W–37L career · 4 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.56
Tim Mask
13W–34L career · 5 lines in 2026
86%14%<1%
3.36
Luke Armstrong
4W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
90%10%<1%
3.34
3.5
Akhilesh Ganti
5W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.