Teams

Kosh Spring 2025

2025 SOUTH EAST TENNIS ADULT 40 & OVER · WOMEN 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-21vs Lee/BowenLost 12
L#1 DoublesPedrina Salinas / Autumn Correnti vs Laura Bowen / Anne Goodwin6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLeigh Burris vs Cyndi Yoder6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesHongjin Bian / Mary Kenworthy vs Kara Gansmann / Stephanie Guanzini3-6, 1-6
2025-05-14vs Thompkins/AntonelliWon 10
W#3 DoublesRebecca Lothe / Christine Bean vs Carol Rodriguez / Juliana Mastroserio6-2, 6-3
2025-04-24vs McAdams/Miller DAYWon 10
W#3 DoublesLisa Morgan / Rebecca Lothe vs Amy Gibbons / Shannon Stephens6-2, 6-4
2025-04-10vs Branco/SchedlerSplit 22
L#1 DoublesVickie Kosh / Leslie Barker vs Darcy Burgard / Sara Branner6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLeigh Burris vs Katherine Sullivan6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLisa Morgan / Mary Kenworthy vs Jennifer Hardison / Lara Reinhart3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDenise Albrecht / Hongjin Bian vs Michelle Willis / Laurie Eskew7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2025-04-10vs Morgan Spring 40-3.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesMary Beth Moore / Leslie Barker vs Jules Sample / Ashby Neal6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJoyce Jordan / Susan Odonnell vs Kris Summers / Laura Rackley7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLeigh Burris / Denise Albrecht vs Charlotte Yow / Jacqui Donovan7-6, 6-1
2025-03-18vs Eshelman/ MartinWon 10
W#3 DoublesLisa Morgan / Rebecca Lothe vs Jean Nichols / Jennifer Hawfield6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Nicole Slocumb
published
3.44
Amy Messier
published 3.5
3.39
Mary Beth Moore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Joyce Jordan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Vickie Kosh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Leigh Burris
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Autumn Correnti
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.30
Leslie Barker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Christine Bean
published 3.5
3.01
Pedrina Salinas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Denise Albrecht
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.88
Mary Kenworthy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.88
Rebecca Lothe
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
Hongjin Bian
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leslie Barker + Mary Beth Moore5064% games−1.7% vs expected
Leslie Barker + Nicole Slocumb404 matchesnot enough data
Leigh Burris + Autumn Correnti123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nicole Slocumb
54W–22L career · no lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Amy Messier
39W–25L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.44
Mary Beth Moore
34W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Joyce Jordan
29W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Vickie Kosh
39W–49L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Leigh Burris
53W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Autumn Correnti
14W–27L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Leslie Barker
35W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.30
3.5
Christine Bean
14W–10L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Pedrina Salinas
14W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.01
3.5
Denise Albrecht
4W–3L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
80%20%<1%
2.88
Mary Kenworthy
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
80%20%<1%
2.88
3.5
Rebecca Lothe
18W–21L career · 7 lines in 2025
80%20%<1%
2.88
Hongjin Bian
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.