Teams

Cox/Rigby

2022 Mixed 18 & Over · 9.0 Combined

13 players · average NTRP 4.42 / ST. LOUIS

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-08-11vs STL/Huchet/18&Over9.0MXDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAlison Cox / Franklin Zhong vs Meg Gregory / Ryan White6-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesSara Gregerson / William Claypool vs Brittany Mohrman / Michael Arceneaux4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-08-04vs CimarolliLost 02
L#1 DoublesFranklin Zhong / Cheryl Perlmutter vs Michael Lesko / Trinity Lopez3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesStephen Kadyk / Alison Cox vs Rob White / Margaret Nosic1-6, 5-7
2022-08-04vs Rusick 9.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesWilliam Claypool / Libby Benoist Claypool vs Shepard Simpson / Brett Hartig4-6, 4-6
2022-07-14vs STL/Huchet/18&Over9.0MXDLost 03
L#1 DoublesBohan Li / Libby Benoist Claypool vs Victoria Zielinski / Ryan White2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesWilliam Claypool / Cheryl Perlmutter vs Ashley Hennis / Michael Carney3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesEric Schrumpf / Jenny Mennerick vs Guillaume Huchet / Severine Huchet5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2022-06-30vs Rusick 9.0Split 11
L#1 DoublesWhitney Smith / Eric Schrumpf vs Christina Pupillo / Ian Keillor7-5, 1-2
W#2 DoublesAlison Cox / William Claypool vs Shepard Simpson / Brett Hartig6-4, 6-2
2022-06-23vs CimarolliLost 12
L#1 DoublesLibby Benoist Claypool / Stephen Kadyk vs Emily Cimarolli / Michael Lesko2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAlison Cox / Franklin Zhong vs Miranda Lopez / Paul Gontarz3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSara Gregerson / William Tosie vs Trinity Lopez / Stefan Nosic5-7, 5-7
2022-06-16vs STL/Huchet/18&Over9.0MXDLost 03
L#1 DoublesWilliam Tosie / Whitney Smith vs Ryan White / Ashley Hennis3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesWilliam Claypool / Libby Benoist Claypool vs Guillaume Huchet / Victoria Zielinski1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesStephen Kadyk / Sara Gregerson vs Kelly Johnston / Michael Arceneaux6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2022-06-09vs CimarolliWon 21
W#1 DoublesWhitney Smith / William Tosie vs Miranda Lopez / Stefan Nosic7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJenny Mennerick / Franklin Zhong vs Trinity Lopez / Paul Stuart5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAlison Cox / Eric Schrumpf vs Margaret Nosic / Rob White3-6, 4-6
2022-06-02vs Rusick 9.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesCheryl Perlmutter / Franklin Zhong vs Allison Rogers / Chris Carpenter7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesWhitney Smith / William Tosie vs Cynthia Behr / Ian Keillor6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 9.0 Combined
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1STL/Huchet/18&Over9.0MXD5315922207
2Cimarolli53141024214
3Cox/Rigby4210819152

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.14 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.50
Franklin Zhong
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 5
4.36
Eric Schrumpf
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.29
William Tosie
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.26
William Claypool
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Alison Cox
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.10
Libby Benoist Claypool
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.08
Cheryl Perlmutter
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.85
Sara Gregerson
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Bohan Li
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Bryan Rigby
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
Jenny Mennerick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Stephen Kadyk
published
Whitney Smith
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

William Tosie + Whitney Smith213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Franklin Zhong
28W–22L career · 5 lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
4.50
4.5
Eric Schrumpf
41W–12L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
4.36
William Tosie
26W–12L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.29
William Claypool
51W–20L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
4.26
4.5
Alison Cox
33W–19L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Libby Benoist Claypool
24W–28L career · 4 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
4.10
4.5
Cheryl Perlmutter
56W–69L career · 3 lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
4.08
Sara Gregerson
53W–51L career · 5 lines in 2022
87%13%<1%
3.85
4
Bohan Li
32W–13L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
4
Bryan Rigby
68W–61L career · 5 lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.66
Jenny Mennerick
34W–18L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Stephen Kadyk
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Whitney Smith
39W–10L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.