Teams

SBartle-DUR

2026 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Women Evening

5 players · average NTRP 2.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-26vs KConklin-DURSplit 11
L#2 SinglesCecilia Gonzales vs Mary Kathryn Oyaga6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesSusanne Schmal vs Sina Mathew7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2026-06-16vs GLoFrese-TOCHLost 01
L#1 SinglesCecilia Gonzales vs Hannah Harvey2-6, 3-6
2026-06-09vs PDavis-DURWon 10
W#2 SinglesLiz Schaller vs Pamela Howell-Davis6-2, 6-3
2026-06-03vs KCaravella-DURLost 01
L#3 SinglesCecilia Gonzales vs Lena Basta2-6, 1-6
2026-05-26vs JDeConto-DurLost 02
L#1 SinglesLiz Schaller vs Julie DeConto2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesChristine Kruse vs Thuy Brooks2-6, 0-6
2026-05-19Lost 02
L#1 SinglesCecilia Gonzales vs Xian Zhang3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesSusanne Schmal vs Carol Zhang1-6, 5-7
2026-05-12vs MWilliamson-DURLost 01
L#1 SinglesLiz Schaller vs Emily Poehlein0-6, 3-6
2026-05-05vs MLong-DURLost 02
L#2 SinglesChristine Kruse vs Sarah Morales2-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesSusanne Schmal vs Thi My Tho Rogers0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.53 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.70
Liz Schaller
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.70
Cecilia Gonzales
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3
2.53
Susanne Schmal
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.43
Shannon Bartle
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #3 Singles 43% · published 3
2.27
Christine Kruse
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Liz Schaller + Shannon Bartle21241% games+0.6% vs expected
Shannon Bartle + Christine Kruse1530% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Liz Schaller
76W–108L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.70
3
Cecilia Gonzales
49W–89L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
2.5
Susanne Schmal
60W–43L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%43%57%
2.53
3
Shannon Bartle
40W–155L career · 7 lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
2.43
2.5
Christine Kruse
16W–59L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.