Teams

Gombert - Daffin Park

2024 · 2025 SATA USTA Adult 65 & Over (Men) - Fall

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-01-19Lost 01
L#3 DoublesHugh Papy / Herb Greenblum vs Rick Culbreth / Richard Griffin6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-12-21vs SATA/Richard GriffinLost 01
L#2 DoublesBarry Hill / Herb Greenblum vs John Adler / Harvey Lynn4-6, 4-6
2024-12-07Lost 01
L#3 DoublesRalph Gombert / Herb Greenblum vs Brian Zevnik / Grant Hagen6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2025 SATA USTA Adult 65 & Over (Men) - Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
John Labarbera
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #1 Singles 23% · published
3.47
Francisco VAldez
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.39
Larry Simpson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.37
Joe Caggiano
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.33
Frederick Knarr
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Ralph Gombert
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.26
Jeffrey Graham
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.15
Herbert Moore
published
3.11
Barry Hill
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
George Miller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Hugh Papy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Edward Johnson
published
Herb Greenblum
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Tom Lanier
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Vincent Grevemberg
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Labarbera + Jeffrey Graham15358% games+7.5% vs expected
Joe Caggiano + John Labarbera5162% games+6.0% vs expected
Larry Simpson + Frederick Knarr11356% games+1.7% vs expected
Tom Lanier + Joe Caggiano4751% gamesnot enough data
Ralph Gombert + Frederick Knarr4167% gamesnot enough data
Herbert Moore + Joe Caggiano213 matchesnot enough data
John Labarbera + Larry Simpson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Labarbera
44W–19L career · 12 lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.66
Francisco VAldez
42W–36L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.47
Larry Simpson
28W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Joe Caggiano
15W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.37
Frederick Knarr
18W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Ralph Gombert
7W–12L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Jeffrey Graham
20W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
Herbert Moore
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Barry Hill
9W–27L career · 6 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
George Miller
2W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.06
Hugh Papy
3W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
Edward Johnson
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Herb Greenblum
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tom Lanier
4W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Vincent Grevemberg
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.