Teams

This Is Us (Beerman) - R. Coulton

2023 Polk Combo 18 & Over Fall · 6.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.38 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-11-02vs Polk/J. Borden/18&Over6.5WLost 01
L#1 DoublesRose Coulton / Courtney Philpot vs Tina Marcewicz / Melissa Darch5-7, 4-6
2023-10-30vs LCC - L. ClarkWon 10
W#2 DoublesRose Coulton / Melissa Butler vs Caroline Miller / Amy Evans6-3, 6-0
2023-10-27vs Polk/J. Borden/18&Over6.5WLost 02
L#1 DoublesAllison Sorenson / Nathaly Arredondo vs Ginger Davis / Anna Previte2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesRose Coulton / Desiree Tchipanova vs Karen Hogg / Tessie Beltran0-6, 4-6
2023-10-19vs LCC - L. ClarkLost 01
L#3 DoublesCourtney Philpot / Allison Sorenson vs Linde Widick / Shannon Miles4-6, 6-7
2023-10-09Won 10
W#2 DoublesRose Coulton / Kelly Neighbors vs Ashley Bailey / Hilary Crenshaw6-2, 6-3
2023-09-28vs LCC - L. ClarkWon 10
W#1 DoublesNathaly Arredondo / Allison Sorenson vs Lizette Murphy / Lauren Clark6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2023-09-21vs Polk/J. Borden/18&Over6.5WLost 01
L#2 DoublesCynthia Nettles / Rose Coulton vs Leisa Jordan / Melissa Darch2-6, 6-7
2023-09-18vs LCC - L. ClarkLost 01
L#1 DoublesRose Coulton / Kelly Neighbors vs Caroline Miller / Courtney Phillips5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Nicole Giusto
published
Danielle Adkins
published 3.5
3.15
Allison Sorenson
published 3.5
3.12
Nathaly Arredondo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Cynthia Nettles
published 3.5
3.07
Brandye Pickering
published 3.5
3.03
Desiree Tchipanova
published 3.5
2.86
Rose Coulton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.73
Courtney Philpot
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Sorenson + Rose Coulton20459% games−1.8% vs expected
Rose Coulton + Courtney Philpot81050% games−6.7% vs expected
Allison Sorenson + Courtney Philpot4256% gamesnot enough data
Allison Sorenson + Nathaly Arredondo314 matchesnot enough data
Allison Sorenson + Desiree Tchipanova033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nicole Giusto
5W–10L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Danielle Adkins
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Allison Sorenson
96W–39L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Nathaly Arredondo
78W–70L career · 2 lines in 2023
19%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Cynthia Nettles
2W–9L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Brandye Pickering
10W–9L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.07
3.5
Desiree Tchipanova
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.03
3
Rose Coulton
110W–109L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Courtney Philpot
79W–74L career · 2 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.