Teams

J Burns

2021 18&Over Mixed · 6.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-03-19vs Bing: S BurnsLost 01
L#1 DoublesJohn Burns / Karen Cromer vs Sue Burns / Leo O'Connor0-6, 1-6
2021-03-12vs Bing: S BurnsLost 02
L#2 DoublesKyle Pignatiello / Amy Paulsen vs TJ Ciaravino / Amanda Spottek5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Burns / Karen Cromer vs Peter Balzani / Taylor Dziekan4-6, 0-6
2021-02-26vs Bing: S BurnsSplit 11
W#2 DoublesKyle Pignatiello / Amy Paulsen vs Sue Burns / Leo O'Connor3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRobert Rizzuto / Karen Cromer vs Brenda Myers / Dominick Pahl4-6, 5-7
2021-01-29vs Bing: S BurnsWon 10
W#1 DoublesKyle Pignatiello / Amy Paulsen vs Sue Burns / TJ Ciaravino6-4, 6-3
2021-01-22vs Bing: S BurnsWon 10
W#3 DoublesJohn Burns / Karen Cromer vs Karyn Kilmartin / Jim Kilmartin7-5, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Yelena Reporyeva
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 4
3.60
Ewelina Zajac-Holdrege
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.52
Rocco Edwards
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Ann Saroka
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Erica Haray
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Amy Paulsen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Karen Cromer
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Kyle Pignatiello
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Mark Saroka
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Robert Rizzuto
published
Scott Wilson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Saroka + Mark Saroka61243% games−1.7% vs expected
Erica Haray + Rocco Edwards224 matchesnot enough data
Kyle Pignatiello + Amy Paulsen213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Yelena Reporyeva
158W–80L career · 13 lines in 2021
<1%38%62%
4.04
3.5
Ewelina Zajac-Holdrege
127W–80L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%22%78%
3.60
3.5
Rocco Edwards
81W–85L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%43%57%
3.52
3.5
Ann Saroka
35W–48L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Erica Haray
83W–102L career · 5 lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.17
3
Amy Paulsen
9W–16L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Karen Cromer
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kyle Pignatiello
19W–17L career · 8 lines in 2021
not enough data
Mark Saroka
24W–31L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Robert Rizzuto
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Scott Wilson
5W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.