Teams

CTL55/Lumpkin/WWD

Adult 55 & Over - USTA · 55 & Over Adult Women 3.5 - Saturday

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-11vs CTL55/McCorkle/CTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesWyndi Green / Stephanie Johnson vs Jennifer Hanner / Lynne Foster6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLaurie Lumpkin / Anny Zalesne vs Beth McCorkle / Amanda Lough3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJ Childs / Gail Harrison vs Anne Miller / Kerry Ford5-7, 3-6
2026-03-30vs CTL55/BARTH/PKWon 30
W#1 DoublesSandra Francis / Wyndi Green vs Shelby Provencher / Helen Russell6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKathryn Peebles / Janet Krupa vs Trish DuBose / Augusta Rembert7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLaurie Lumpkin / Jennifer Wilson vs Wanda Pipes / Mertha Ratterree6-3, 6-4
2026-03-28vs CTL55/Donnelly/CTFCWon 21
L#1 DoublesJennifer Wilson / J Childs vs Christine Clements / Sandy Lybrand2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSandra Francis / Wyndi Green vs Diane Donnelly / Jamie Gordon6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJanet Krupa / Kathryn Peebles vs Amanda Henry / Kim Aydlette6-2, 6-2
2026-03-22vs CTL55/Gee/CTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesWyndi Green / Sandra Francis vs Maria Tubolino / Rita Squires1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLaurie Lumpkin / Gail Harrison vs Michelle Willm / Molly Boozer5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJanet Krupa / Stephanie Johnson vs Anne Kinard / Shelley Adams2-6, 2-6
2026-03-07vs CTL55/BARTH/PKWon 21
L#1 DoublesSandra Francis / Carol Ivey vs Shelby Provencher / Nancy OConnor0-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesWyndi Green / Janet Krupa vs Trish DuBose / Augusta Rembert2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Wilson / Anny Zalesne vs Gloria Caballero / Ginger Bates6-4, 6-4
2026-03-03vs CTL55/Donnelly/CTFCWon 30
W#1 DoublesKathryn Peebles / Laurie Lumpkin vs Susan Arling / Sandy Lybrand6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Wilson / Wyndi Green vs Kim Hale / Christine Clements3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJanet Krupa / Stephanie Johnson vs Diane Donnelly / Jamie Gordon2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-02-28vs CTL55/McCorkle/CTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesWyndi Green / Carol Ivey vs Susan Zais / Lynne Foster6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKathryn Peebles / Nan Smith vs Jennifer Hanner / Beth McCorkle4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnny Zalesne / Jennifer Wilson vs Jill Cutler / Kerry Ford3-6, 2-6
2026-02-07vs CTL55/Gee/CTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesCarol Ivey / Wyndi Green vs Shelley Adams / Anne Kinard6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSandra Francis / Nan Smith vs Molly Boozer / Maria Tubolino5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLaurie Lumpkin / Kathryn Peebles vs Rita Squires / Vandrea Lang6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult Women 3.5 - Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Janet Krupa
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.48
Kathryn Peebles
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.31
Wyndi Green
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.23
Anny Zalesne
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Laurie Lumpkin
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.20
Sandra Francis
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.15
Carol Ivey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
J Childs
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.85
Gail Harrison
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Nan Smith
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wyndi Green + Janet Krupa9165% games+7.1% vs expected
Wyndi Green + Gail Harrison5256% games+3.0% vs expected
Wyndi Green + Carol Ivey8552% games+1.1% vs expected
Wyndi Green + Laurie Lumpkin7648% games−0.7% vs expected
Anny Zalesne + Janet Krupa1543% games−1.2% vs expected
Sandra Francis + Carol Ivey4744% games−3.5% vs expected
Wyndi Green + Anny Zalesne3341% games−14.7% vs expected
Gail Harrison + Janet Krupa5162% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Janet Krupa
120W–72L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
3.49
Kathryn Peebles
45W–58L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.48
Wyndi Green
113W–109L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Anny Zalesne
51W–72L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Laurie Lumpkin
61W–79L career · 5 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Sandra Francis
31W–80L career · 5 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Carol Ivey
23W–42L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
J Childs
18W–40L career · 2 lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
2.96
Gail Harrison
137W–141L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
Nan Smith
9W–14L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.