Teams

Brown K - Mixed 40s 8.0

2022 Piedmont Mixed Doubles 40 & Over · 8.0 Mixed 40 & Over

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-07-23vs Robb - Mixed 40s 8.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesLinda Hall / Jason Altmann vs Leigh Ann Oldis / Tony Lancaster6-1, 7-5
2022-07-18vs Albright - Mixed 40s 8.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesLynne Murray / Jason Altmann vs Stephen Keaney / Stephanie Bettinger2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJohn Bradley / Linda Hall vs Kenny Winter / Stephanie Keaney7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSallye Parker / Peter Novosad vs Erin Richardson / Keith Black6-2, 6-1
2022-06-30vs Smith - Mixed 40's 8.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesJohn Huggins / Linda Hall vs Charles Dawson / Caroline McAlister2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-06-20vs Dagger - Mixed 40s 8.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesLinda Hall / John Huggins vs Courtney Dagger / Thomas Dagger6-0, 6-1
2022-06-13vs DEAN - Mixed 40s 8.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesJason Altmann / Sallye Parker vs Mike Mango / Carrie Ganim6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2022-06-06vs Davis - Mixed 40s 8.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesJason Altmann / Lynne Murray vs Philip Cooke / Julie Cooke6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCharles Mcmasters / Linda Hall vs Tommy Starnes / Christine Hinch6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Jason Altmann
published
3.92
Peter Novosad
published
3.85
Brad McAmis
published 4
3.69
Pam McAmis
published
3.68
Lynne Murray
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Sallye Parker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.54
Minerva Loran
published
3.32
Kathy Brown
published
Linda Hall
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Ric Parker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brad McAmis + Pam McAmis123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jason Altmann
27W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
4.03
Peter Novosad
39W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Brad McAmis
10W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.85
Pam McAmis
13W–23L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.69
Lynne Murray
164W–88L career · 2 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
Sallye Parker
146W–124L career · 2 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
Minerva Loran
13W–18L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.54
Kathy Brown
14W–22L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
Linda Hall
100W–71L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Ric Parker
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.