Teams

Alexandra Cabral

2024 Singles Fun Flex Women · 3.5 W

1 player · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings20 teams · 3.5 W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Rabia Hayden6060031
2Mari Inagami4141439
3Jennifer Amadeo2222435
4Gulay Philip101019
5Susan Williams1111216
6Amélie Vanier1111218
7Stefanie Kreiger1313645
8Haidee Bolanos1313641
9Carola Cazenave1313647
10sandra rose000000
11Annemarie Rothe000000
12Katherine Curtin000000
13Christiana Perrein000000
14Lauren Reed000000
15Nicole Fiftal000000
16Olga Burke000000
17Ellen Feeney000000
18Alexandra Cabral0101113
19Diane Falconer0101212
20Andrea Fleischman0202425

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Alexandra Cabral
published 4
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alexandra Cabral
81W–99L career · no lines in 2024
76%24%<1%
3.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.