Teams

CACM BLUE

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 4.07 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-19vs WP REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesTodd Harrington / Bob Lees vs Ralf Weizenbeck / Jeff Cornelius7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMichael Hallowell vs Derek Since1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAdam Huff / W Hancock vs Ty Bartels / Brian OMalley6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMitchell Morrissey / Brian Pinkerton vs Andrew Baker / Daniel Green2-6, 1-6
2021-07-12vs CP REDLost 04
L#1 DoublesBob Lees / Jonah Staller vs Brian Brillantes / Karl Erickson2-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesEddie Pells vs Josh Griff1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMitchell Morrissey / Michael Hallowell vs Charles Philp / Mustafa Neemuchwala2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAdam Huff / Brian Pinkerton vs Jeffrey D'Andrea / Gabriel Neises2-6, 3-6
2021-07-05vs DTC REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesTodd Harrington / Brian Pinkerton vs David Bowman / Michael Demong0-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesEddie Pells vs Brad Yamamoto6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAdam Huff / W Hancock vs John Cleveland / Steven Ziegler6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJonah Staller / Mitchell Morrissey vs Jonathan Musser / Patrick O'Neal1-6, 3-6
2021-06-28vs DTC BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesBrian Pinkerton / Bob Lees vs Winston Lapham / Chris Erickson2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMichael Hallowell vs Carlton Willey0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAdam Huff / W Hancock vs JD Ready / Tony Graziano4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTodd Harrington / Mitchell Morrissey vs Matthew Wiens / Arthur Turnbill6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2021-06-21vs STAP REDLost 04
L#1 DoublesTodd Harrington / Michael Hallowell vs Adam Koszowski / Danny Bartell2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesW Hancock vs Adam Gilden4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAdam Huff / Brian Pinkerton vs Graham Forman / Ronald Ramirez3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJonah Staller / Mitchell Morrissey vs Woonghee Lee / Matt Anderson5-7, 2-6
2021-06-14vs GTC BLUELost 04
L#1 DoublesBrian Pinkerton / W Hancock vs Sam Ryan / Miles Doane1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMichael Hallowell vs Patrick Dahnert3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBob Lees / Jonah Staller vs James Sanders / Sameer Mehta3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMitchell Morrissey / Todd Harrington vs Garth Weinstein / Jeff Ceurvorst1-6, 5-7
2021-06-07vs ATC GREENWon 31
L#1 DoublesBob Lees / Jonah Staller vs Daniel Washburne / Matthew Domich6-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesEddie Pells vs James Croney7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesAdam Huff / W Hancock vs Huntington Walker / Tab McGinley6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMitchell Morrissey / Michael Hallowell vs John Speer / Randy Swenson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
W Hancock
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
3.78
Bob Lees
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.74
Mitchell Morrissey
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.73
Michael Hallowell
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.72
Adam Huff
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.68
Eddie Pells
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.58
Jonah Staller
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.49
Brian Pinkerton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Todd Harrington
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Hallowell + Brian Pinkerton2347% games+4.5% vs expected
W Hancock + Adam Huff91248% games+0.9% vs expected
Bob Lees + Jonah Staller7948% games+0.2% vs expected
Bob Lees + Adam Huff3451% games−3.5% vs expected
Brian Pinkerton + Adam Huff141848% games−4.8% vs expected
Mitchell Morrissey + Jonah Staller3445% games−5.3% vs expected
Brian Pinkerton + Todd Harrington1639% games−6.5% vs expected
Bob Lees + Brian Pinkerton1438% games−10.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
W Hancock
44W–59L career · 6 lines in 2021
10%89%<1%
4.16
4
Bob Lees
21W–45L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Mitchell Morrissey
54W–52L career · 7 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Michael Hallowell
75W–58L career · 6 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Adam Huff
53W–85L career · 6 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Eddie Pells
16W–29L career · 3 lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.68
Jonah Staller
23W–43L career · 5 lines in 2021
28%72%<1%
3.58
4
Brian Pinkerton
22W–48L career · 6 lines in 2021
52%48%<1%
3.49
Todd Harrington
16W–60L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.