← Teams

THPRD-Kim (3.0)

2022 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 2.94 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Yongseok Cheon
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.95
Jose Hwang
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.83
Seungmin Hong
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
—
Dongseok Shin
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
—
Minchul Kim
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
—
WONKYUNG KIM
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.66
Seung-Hee Bae
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
—
KIHYON KIM
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 2.5
Results8 ties
2022-06-11Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesWONKYUNG KIM / Jose Hwang vs Lawrence Cooper / Kevin Grainger7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDongseok Shin / Seung-Hee Bae vs John Ellett / Morris Crump6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSeungmin Hong / Sanghyun Seo vs Deon Logan / Ronald Skoletsky6-4, 6-4
2022-06-04Split 2–2
W#1 DoublesYongseok Cheon / Hyung Seok Kim vs Stuart Hogue / Scott Dickinson6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSeungmin Hong vs Ben Lauritsen6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJose Hwang / WONKYUNG KIM vs Matt Elmgren / DeWayne Ledbetter6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesSanghyun Seo / Seung-Hee Bae vs Kim Sterkendries / Jason Floyd5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-05-21Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesSeungmin Hong / Jose Hwang vs Peter Schulman / Nasser Khan6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesWONKYUNG KIM / Yongseok Cheon vs Vasilios Garyfallou / Brian Parker4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKIHYON KIM / Seung-Hee Bae vs Thomas Gewecke / Jack Dempsey6-1, 6-0
2022-05-06Lost 0–4
L#1 DoublesHyung Seok Kim / Yongseok Cheon vs Martin von Haartman / Suresh Chand7-6, 6-2
L#1 SinglesKIHYON KIM vs Eddie Shin6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDongseok Shin / WONKYUNG KIM vs WonKyu Kim / Nhan Phan6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGreg Choi / Seungmin Hong vs Todd McConachie / Hoon Shin6-4, 6-4
2022-04-30Split 2–2
W#1 DoublesJose Hwang / Seungmin Hong vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesKIHYON KIM vs Erik Bucher6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesWONKYUNG KIM / Hyung Seok Kim vs James North / Steve Gradow4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMinchul Kim / Seung-Hee Bae vs Mark Persinger / Maulin Patel5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-04-23Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesWONKYUNG KIM / Jose Hwang vs Lars Kasch / Tim Janes6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSanghyun Seo / Seungmin Hong vs Joe Malboeuf / David Floyd6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSeung-Hee Bae / Dongseok Shin vs Thomas Croll / Steve DeKlotz6-2, 6-2
2022-04-16Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesJose Hwang / Seungmin Hong vs Reza Kalantari / Patrick Morrissey2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesWONKYUNG KIM / Dongseok Shin vs Keibun Hayashi / Robert Wood6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKIHYON KIM / Minchul Kim vs James Prouty / Noah Davis6-2, 6-3
2022-04-10Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesYongseok Cheon / Dongseok Shin vs Scott Dickinson / Alex Delarosa2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSeungmin Hong vs Jason Floyd6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesKIHYON KIM / Sanghyun Seo vs Kim Sterkendries / David Huang6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Yongseok Cheon
65W–28L career
0%14%86%
3.25
3
Jose Hwang
24W–15L career
0%85%15%
2.95
3
Seungmin Hong
28W–24L career
0%98%2%
2.83
3
Dongseok Shin
8W–15L career
not enough data
—
3
Minchul Kim
6W–10L career
not enough data
—
3
WONKYUNG KIM
8W–6L career
not enough data
—
3
Seung-Hee Bae
11W–31L career
8%92%0%
2.66
2.5
KIHYON KIM
2W–12L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.