Teams

SLTHC-Haroldsen/Leatham

2026 Fall Outdoor League-Saturday · 3.5W

17 players · average NTRP 3.25 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings12 teams · 3.5W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SM-Harris & the Serve-Ivors000000
2Sports Mall-Finlay000000
3Liberty Park-Causing a Racquet000000
4Park City MARC-Krueger/Siano000000
5SLTHC-Bayna000000
6Cottonwood-Haverkost/Nielsen000000
7SLTHC-Haroldsen/Leatham000000
8Liberty Park-Prince-Hagood/Kesler000000
9Trentman000000
10SunPro Advantage000000
11Spencer000000
12Sports Mall-Stroud-Peterson/Farr000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Lindsay Trevino
published 3.5
3.27
Betsy Ostrander
published 3.5
3.22
Jamie DeLong
published 3.5
3.22
Carine Stearman
published 3.5
3.21
Chloe Schott
published 3.5
3.14
Kyra Dunshee
published 3.5
3.10
Lauren Murphy
published
3.06
Linda Byington
published
3.04
Madison Myer
published
3.03
Nicole Leatham
published
2.99
2.88
Nancy Matz
published 3
2.85
Maria Pettit
published 3
2.84
Davinia Lyon
published 3
2.81
Mckenna Kimball
published 3
2.73
Kelly Singer
published
2.65
Diana Vogel
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicole Leatham + Betsy Ostrander22961% games+8.3% vs expected
Kyra Dunshee + Linda Byington4353% games+7.3% vs expected
Diana Vogel + Kelly Singer131154% games+5.3% vs expected
Maria Pettit + Jamie DeLong4257% games+4.0% vs expected
Nancy Matz + Maria Pettit4355% games+2.7% vs expected
Nicole Leatham + Linda Byington9261% games+1.9% vs expected
Nicole Leatham + Davinia Lyon10857% games+1.6% vs expected
Maria Pettit + Davinia Lyon2439% games−7.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lindsay Trevino
61W–22L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Betsy Ostrander
88W–48L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Jamie DeLong
171W–129L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Carine Stearman
10W–9L career · type S · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Chloe Schott
28W–11L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Kyra Dunshee
96W–117L career · no lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
Lauren Murphy
19W–19L career · no lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.10
Linda Byington
72W–70L career · no lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.06
Madison Myer
3W–8L career · no lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.04
Nicole Leatham
106W–119L career · no lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.03
3
Candace Haroldsen
86W–59L career · no lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Nancy Matz
48W–72L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Maria Pettit
187W–196L career · no lines in 2026
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Davinia Lyon
61W–55L career · no lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Mckenna Kimball
26W–9L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%9%
2.81
Kelly Singer
33W–50L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Diana Vogel
52W–77L career · no lines in 2026
14%85%1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.