Teams

LOTC-Freier/Brink

2023 Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.17 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Mary Head
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Susan Browning
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.03
Jana Hirst
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Results5 ties
2023-05-02Lost 02
L#2 DoublesSusan Browning / Vera Vos vs Ann Cassin / Gina Ariosa6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJana Hirst / Ann Davidson vs Kathleen Murrin / Susie Garland6-4, 6-1
2023-04-18Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMary McCarter / Jana Hirst vs Sue Edmonds / Karen Gee6-4, 6-2
2023-04-14Won 10
W#3 DoublesSusan Browning / Vera Vos vs Linda Clayton / Linda Castaneda6-1, 6-1
2023-04-07Split 11
L#2 DoublesJana Hirst / Vera Vos vs Shelley Laurance / Angela Addington6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPam Freier / Susan Browning vs Judy van Gasse / Linda Humphrey6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2023-03-17Lost 02
L#2 DoublesMary Head / Judy Orlandini vs Colleen Hamilton / Raymonde Narlow7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJana Hirst / Gale Schmidt vs Denise Angel / Pauline Reilly6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Mary Head
14W–31L career
12%86%1%
3.17
3
Susan Browning
45W–42L career
0%60%40%
3.07
3
Jana Hirst
33W–66L career
0%66%34%
3.03

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.