Teams

WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40AW4.5A

2024 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 4.5

23 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.01 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41
Riki Sorenson
published
4.35
Angie Esswein
published 4.5
4.31
Noa Ramo-Larios
published
4.29
Chandra Thomas
published 4.5
4.25
Jennifer Essner
published
4.25
Jessica Kim
published
4.21
Petra Reinecke
published
4.15
Malaika Stoll
published
4.04
Katy Keim
published
3.98
Holli Strain
published
3.95
Julianne Gee
published
3.93
Ashley Kechter
published 4.5
3.89
Caitlin Finnell
published 4.5
3.89
Wyler Collo
published
3.87
Kathryn Aguilar
published
3.86
Puja Mukherjee
published
3.78
3.78
Jo Baker
published
3.78
Mai Angsupanich
published
3.75
Shin Koo
published
3.57
Melissa Heng Steele
published
Lilana Spindler
published
Stacey Huang
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Essner + Katy Keim4170% games+13.1% vs expected
Jessica Kim + Chandra Thomas6357% games+5.0% vs expected
Chandra Thomas + Noa Ramo-Larios3346% games+3.8% vs expected
Wyler Collo + Stacey Huang224 matchesnot enough data
Malaika Stoll + Mai Angsupanich033 matchesnot enough data
Kathryn Aguilar + Puja Mukherjee123 matchesnot enough data
Katy Keim + Angie Esswein303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Riki Sorenson
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.41
4.5
Angie Esswein
10W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%14%
4.35
Noa Ramo-Larios
17W–13L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
4.31
4.5
Chandra Thomas
27W–14L career · type A · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
4.29
Jennifer Essner
14W–10L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
4.25
Jessica Kim
32W–15L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
4.25
Petra Reinecke
10W–6L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
4.21
Malaika Stoll
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%1%
4.15
Katy Keim
10W–5L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
4.04
Holli Strain
11W–13L career · no lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
3.98
Julianne Gee
7W–9L career · no lines in 2024
65%35%<1%
3.95
4.5
Ashley Kechter
0W–11L career · no lines in 2024
69%31%<1%
3.93
4.5
Caitlin Finnell
3W–13L career · no lines in 2024
78%22%<1%
3.89
Wyler Collo
14W–13L career · no lines in 2024
78%22%<1%
3.89
Kathryn Aguilar
12W–18L career · no lines in 2024
83%17%<1%
3.87
Puja Mukherjee
13W–17L career · no lines in 2024
84%16%<1%
3.86
Tina Sorensen Berman
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
94%6%<1%
3.78
Jo Baker
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
94%6%<1%
3.78
Mai Angsupanich
8W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%2%98%
3.78
Shin Koo
4W–13L career · no lines in 2024
96%4%<1%
3.75
Melissa Heng Steele
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.57
Lilana Spindler
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Stacey Huang
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.