Teams

DThayaprasat (Park Road)

2024 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 5.0 Women - Sat PM

12 players · average NTRP 4.92 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-05-16Won 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Anderson / Kindell Schmitt vs Diana West / Hannah Chillag7-5, 6-4
2024-04-28vs MLewis/West (Park Rd)Won 10
W#1 DoublesKindell Schmitt / Carson Rose Tennyson vs Melanie Lewis / Kelsey McKillop6-1, 6-0
2024-04-13Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDarri Thayaprasat / Laine Parker Horvath vs Natalie Osman / Jaclyn Rock4-6, 2-6
2024-03-23Lost 01
L#1 SinglesLaine Parker Horvath vs MAGDALENA STUDENOVSKY4-6, 5-7
2024-03-16vs MLewis/West (Park Rd)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKindell Schmitt / Carson Rose Tennyson vs Tanya Hecht / Natalie Ivanov5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 5.0 Women - Sat PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.55 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.84
Abbey Neff
published 5
4.82
Sarah Cimmino
published
4.67
Brittney Desmond
published 5
4.65
Kindell Schmitt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.63
Lindsey Stuckey
published
4.57
Lauren Laughton
published
4.57
4.43
4.21
Laine Parker Horvath
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.15
Darri Thayaprasat
published 4.5
Sanjana Sudhir
published
Savanna Dumit
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Cimmino + Darri Thayaprasat404 matchesnot enough data
Sanjana Sudhir + Hannah English Rahill314 matchesnot enough data
Darri Thayaprasat + Kindell Schmitt123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Abbey Neff
20W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%89%10%
4.84
Sarah Cimmino
11W–0L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%9%
4.82
5
Brittney Desmond
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
10%90%1%
4.67
5
Kindell Schmitt
118W–40L career · 8 lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
4.65
Lindsey Stuckey
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
4.63
Lauren Laughton
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
4.57
5
Hannah English Rahill
16W–6L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
4.57
5
Carson Rose Tennyson
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
70%30%<1%
4.43
Laine Parker Horvath
50W–35L career · 2 lines in 2024
5%94%1%
4.21
4.5
Darri Thayaprasat
13W–8L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%<1%
4.15
Sanjana Sudhir
14W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Savanna Dumit
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.